You can currently do that via a tyconpower poe switch


Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr



From: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Organization: SPITwSPOTS
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, October 6, 2014 at 2:54 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas

That would be cool

Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com>

On 10/05/2014 10:46 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af wrote:
Ok.  Got it.  I've also at one time or another thought that it would be neat to 
do it the other way for MTU settings.  One radio on the roof, plugged into an 
ethernet switch and the whole thing powered from PoE from each tenant where 
only one tenant needed to have their poe plugged in to power on the whole 
device.

-forrest

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:44 AM, timothy steele via Af 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I was talking about powering 1 CPE and 1 AP with 1 POE for micro pops

—
Sent from Mailbox<https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox>



On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

150W is pretty hard to deliver via CAT5.

Each wire is rated at  .577 amps.  Ignoring other concerns, this means at 48V, 
you get about 25 watts with a bit of margin, per wire.  If you are sending the 
power up on two pairs, and returning it on the other two, this means you only 
have about 100W total you can do via CAT5 (110W with no margin).    To do over 
100W you have to use something else for the return path, say the tower or a 
ground wire - in which case you could send 200W up a CAT5 cable and return it 
via ground.

Personally once you get that much power in a CAT5 cable it scares me.  A LOT of 
voltage drop, challenges in injection methods, etc

Most ethernet magnetics top out at about 25.5W for power on two pairs, and 51W 
for four.  This also corresponds to the 802.3at spec.   I guess if you're 
returning on ground, you can also get 102W.

Right now I'm focusing on the <50W category (ok, maybe a smidgen more).

-forrest

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Exalt ExtremeAir Radios draw 135watt average over PoE. Telrad Radios we use 
draw up to 150watt but usually around 120ish.



Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
530.272.4000<tel:530.272.4000>

On 10/05/2014 04:55 PM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote:
What radio needs 150w?



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com<http://www.aeronetpr.com>
@aeronetpr



From: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>
Date: Sunday, October 5, 2014 at 7:14 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas

This is actually in the category of what I'm expending a fair bit of R&D on 
right now.

The challenge comes cost.   150watt per port is very expensive to do when 
factoring in the DC-DC conversion.   20W is  easy.  50W is a bit harder.  150W 
gets very expensive quickly.

As a result, I'm thinking somewhat modular, i.e. pick/choose.

I also have to be mindful of the competitors in the space, in that I want to be 
different in the right ways.   The power injection/switching space is quite 
crowded.

-forrest

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>> 
wrote:

    Our infrastructure sites look like this:

    Shielded Cables -> 8 or 24port shielded patch panel
    -> APC PRM24 with WB Surge Modules
    -> PoE Injectors
    -> Switch / Router

    PoE Injectors are attached to a Masterswitch.


    <pipe dream>
    I know this probably is not feasible but....
    What I would REALLY like is an active PoE midspan injector (8/24
    gigabit port). Something that does not require a site monitor (has
    web/snmp function built in). It takes AC power and can output DC
    to each type of device. This device would be software configurable
    for power type and has apc masterswitch functionality. It would
    need to support up to 150watt per port for WiMAX and Licensed Link
    Radios. It would need to support from 12vdc to 56vdc output. If
    there was a model that also supported power out to a few (4) AC
    outlets I wouldn't even need an APC Masterswitch. The goal is to
    replace all those PoE injectors which don't mount in a rack or on
    a din rail in a box.
    </pipe dream>



    Matthew Jenkins
    SmarterBroadband
    [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
    530.272.4000<tel:530.272.4000> <tel:530.272.4000<tel:530.272.4000>>



    On 10/05/2014 01:19 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af wrote:

        It's been (quite) a while since I sent one of these messages
        out to the list.

        With the release of all of our new gigabit injectors, it is
        time for me to decide which products will be next out the door
        at PacketFlux.

        We've got several products at various stages of completion,
        but almost all of them I expect to be very low volume projects
        - the type of products we complete just because they help fill
        out our product offering instead of expecting a lot of revenue
        from them.   A couple of these have appeared on the website
        recently - I.E. a 2 Relay, 3 Switch module, and the
        voltmeter/shunt input modules.

        So, what I'd love to hear is some suggestions for products
        PacketFlux could build which would help you in your WISP. I'm
        particularly looking for products which if they existed would
        go at every one of your tower sites, or even better at every
        customer location.  I know these product ideas exist out
        there, and I'd love to hear them.   Feel free to throw ideas
        out which are outside of the narrow niche that you think of
        PacketFlux fitting into.

        One final note  - there is always a query for an all-in-one
        tower device which includes some mixture of ac power supply,
        dc-dc conversion, battery charging/management, Ethernet
        switch, router, power injection, fiber conversion, etc.. I've
        heard those loud and clear and am aware of that desire.
        There's work being done in-house toward something like that,
        but there are many hurdles left to make it a reality. If
        there's a simplified version of this which would fit a
        specific, widespread, need I'd love to hear about it, but the
        idea of a device you put into your rack and it handles
        everything needed at a tower site is still quite a ways off
        for us.

        So, throw your best ideas out there... I'd love to take a
        couple and run with them.

        -forrest











Reply via email to