Rack mount 24 port sync over power injector.  Possibly with surge protection.


On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) via
Af <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's been (quite) a while since I sent one of these messages out to the
> list.
>
> With the release of all of our new gigabit injectors, it is time for me to
> decide which products will be next out the door at PacketFlux.
>
> We've got several products at various stages of completion, but almost all
> of them I expect to be very low volume projects - the type of products we
> complete just because they help fill out our product offering instead of
> expecting a lot of revenue from them.   A couple of these have appeared on
> the website recently - I.E. a 2 Relay, 3 Switch module, and the
> voltmeter/shunt input modules.
>
> So, what I'd love to hear is some suggestions for products PacketFlux could
> build which would help you in your WISP.   I'm particularly looking for
> products which if they existed would go at every one of your tower sites, or
> even better at every customer location.  I know these product ideas exist
> out there, and I'd love to hear them.   Feel free to throw ideas out which
> are outside of the narrow niche that you think of PacketFlux fitting into.
>
> One final note  - there is always a query for an all-in-one tower device
> which includes some mixture of ac power supply, dc-dc conversion, battery
> charging/management, Ethernet switch, router, power injection, fiber
> conversion, etc..   I've heard those loud and clear and am aware of that
> desire.   There's work being done in-house toward something like that, but
> there are many hurdles left to make it a reality.  If there's a simplified
> version of this which would fit a specific, widespread, need I'd love to
> hear about it, but the idea of a device you put into your rack and it
> handles everything needed at a tower site is still quite a ways off for us.
>
> So, throw your best ideas out there... I'd love to take a couple and run
> with them.
>
> -forrest
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to