What are their alternatives Bill?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Matt Jenkins via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > I am using an RB2011 as a VPLS NID to provide 100meg DIA to a customer. It > works great. > > Matthew Jenkins > SmarterBroadband > [email protected] > 530.272.4000 > > On 10/29/2014 05:56 PM, David Milholen via Af wrote: > >> We do similar and if the customer doesnt have these things at the >> termination point we offer a lease or purchase for the extended equipment. >> I still cant get away from Mikrotiks CCR routers instead of the latter. >> >> On 10/29/2014 7:29 PM, Paul Stewart via Af wrote: >> >>> That pricing is similar to what we charge when using PTP600 directly >>> back to a fiber fed "hub site". At the customer site, we install an APC >>> 1500 UPS (with SNMP management) and a Juniper SRX router - fully managed >>> and monitored from NOC. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Jenkins via Af >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 5:00 PM >>> To:[email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] price range for a dedicated 100x100 service. >>> >>> Base Price: >>> 1yr Contract: $1980/mo >>> 2yr Contract: $1870/mo >>> 3yr Contract: $1760/mo >>> >>> We negotiate discounts from those prices. Usually end up giving >>> customers 20-30% off to "make a deal". DIA services are always negotiable. >>> Sometimes we have to add to them to deal with all the upgrades necessary to >>> get to the customer. >>> >>> Install depends on required equipment. Airfiber is usually not a big >>> deal. Licensed link could be the cost of the link spread over term of >>> contract. >>> >>> You also have to consider what it takes from your backbone to deliver >>> that. How many sites from your upstream is it? Do you need to charge enough >>> to cover future upgrades to your backhauls, routers, etc? What about >>> upgrades to UPSes in the path? >>> >>> Just some things to consider. >>> >>> Matthew Jenkins >>> SmarterBroadband >>> [email protected] >>> 530.272.4000 >>> >>> On 10/29/2014 01:25 PM, Bill Prince via Af wrote: >>> >>>> No Comcast here. No AT&T here. Others as well. >>>> >>>> Only real competition at this site would be bonded T1 lines. Qty 1 T1 >>>> in this location would be ~~ $500 per month. >>>> >>>> There might be another Wireless provider that could get through the >>>> hole in the trees, but the number would be very, very limited. >>>> >>>> bp >>>> On 10/29/2014 1:22 PM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote: >>>> >>>>> What are Comcast\TW\AT&T\Zayo\etc. selling 100 megs for? That's where >>>>> you want to sell your 100 megs, assuming you're not losing your ass >>>>> at that rate. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+Intelligent >>>>> ComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligen >>>>> t-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> --- >>>>> *From: *"Bill Prince via Af"<[email protected]> >>>>> *To: *"Motorola III"<[email protected]> >>>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, October 29, 2014 1:57:39 PM >>>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] price range for a dedicated 100x100 service. >>>>> >>>>> We have a new subscriber we're providing dedicated 24x24 service >>>>> right now. >>>>> >>>>> He's asked for a quote for dedicated 100x100 service. The link is ~~ >>>>> 8.5 miles. Right now, I'm thinking we need to put in a licensed link. >>>>> The site is active with 2 PMP450 APs, and I do not want to interfere >>>>> on a site with relatively tight spectrum demands, so anything in 5.8 >>>>> is out of the question. >>>>> >>>>> I don't really need technical advice, but I'm looking for advice on >>>>> how to price this. Typically, we charge 30-50 % of the equipment >>>>> cost and then price the monthly recurring to recover the remaining >>>>> equipment cost over 12 months. However, I would like to entertain >>>>> alternatives. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> bp >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> -- >> > >
