I don’t disagree, but it presents some marketing and tech support issues 
dealing with customers.

If 4K streaming requires 25M as Netflix says, that’s around 15 times what SD 
requires and 6 times what HD (720p) requires.  I don’t think customers think of 
it that way, and they certainly don’t want to pay 6 or 15 times as much, more 
like 1.5X or 2X if anything.

Add this to the trend of having 2, 3, 5 or more streams going at once and in 
their head it’s a binary thing, can I stream on your service or can’t I?  As 
someone posted the other day, 6M does not mean 6M per device.

I already get a fair amount of calls from people either watching Netflix while 
others in the house are watching Youtube, or they are watching streams on their 
Apple TV or via Amazon or Hulu that take more bandwidth than Netflix.  In some 
cases I think those services are optimized for download and watch later rather 
than live streaming.

You’d think people would observe Netflix works but Vudu doesn’t, and blame it 
on the streaming service.  But everything these days is “my Internet is slow”.  
I had someone yesterday who had managed to both turn off WiFi on their router 
and unplug the Internet cable, but the reported problem was “my Internet is 
slow”.

Add in the binary choice “can I stream or can’t I”, and I think we need some 
really good talking points and phone support scripts to explain to people why 
they need to upgrade to a higher more expensive plan, rather than saying I used 
to be able to stream Netflix SD, now I can’t stream 4K, you need to send 
someone out to fix my Internet connection, it doesn’t work like it used to, I’m 
not getting what I’m paying for.

As far as pricing, my rule of thumb is price goes up as the square root of 
bandwidth, so 2X speed is around 1.4X price.  But that would make 15X speed 
around 4X price, which I think is fair, but customers will think is outrageous. 
 From their perspective, 4K is incrementally better looking than SD, plus 
everyone knows additional bandwidth costs ISPs next to nothing.

This is gonna take some slick marketing.


From: Rory Conaway via Af 
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:59 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazonstreaming4Know.

I’m looking at this as the reason to raise prices.  I don’t see a downside but 
I don’t have towers.

 

Rory

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown via Af
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 7:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazonstreaming4Know.

 

You boys are probably still slapping the side of the TV to get the picture to 
straighten up, right?

 

From: CBB - Jay Fuller via Af 

Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:45 AM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazonstreaming4Know.

 

 

i assume you no one here in alabama (except us techies) knows what 4ktv is.  i 
honestly don't even...

 

  ----- Original Message ----- 

  From: Ryan Ghering via Af 

  To: [email protected] 

  Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:36 AM

  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon streaming4Know.

   

  It's especially worrisome with Newegg and Tiger selling cheap off brand 4K's 
under 500 bucks. And Roku is starting a big sale this week. 

  I've already had calls this morning if customers current bandwidth will 
stream 4k. NOPE sorry.. Then I tell them what package we do offer that will 
support it and they freek out. Like I'm gona give bandwidth away for free. GEEZ

   

  On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:30 AM, That One Guy via Af <[email protected]> wrote:

  This is going to make for an ugly christmas season. 

  If we had customer service who was firm it wouldnt be an issue "we dont offer 
that speed currently"

  but instead, the customers on 900 will be the ones who get the tv, and the 
subscription and call in, and CS will keep saying, well isnt there anything we 
can do for this guy in the middle of the forrest with the 300 foot cable run? 
and Ill have to go home and punch one of my children, probably the boy, Im kind 
of afraid of the girl.

   

   

  On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af <[email protected]> wrote:

  A quick Google search comes up with Audials and Playlater.  It does not 
appear to be rocket science.

   

  From: Jason McKemie via Af 

  Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 10:18 PM

  To: [email protected] 

  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon streaming 
4Know.

   

  I'd think if someone could figure out a way to get the movies from RAM, they 
could also figure out a way to capture them from a stream.

   

  On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Travis Johnson via Af <[email protected]> wrote:

  Because then people could "save" the movies in RAM, and someone would figure 
out a way to be able to download them and put them on the Internet for free.

  It's a licensing issue... that's why "streaming" is OK.

  Travis

  On 12/9/2014 7:00 PM, Bill Prince via Af wrote:

    That 187MB translates to only about 11.25 GB per hour.  Why not stick in a 
32GB memory and be done?  That would be almost 3 hours of buffer.




--bp<part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com> On 12/9/2014 4:50 
PM, Travis Johnson via Af wrote:

      It's really too bad that the devices that support all these streaming 
services can't have a larger buffer. I'm sure it's part of their licensing 
deals, but if they could buffer 60 seconds of stream (at any quality), they 
would have much fewer support calls for streaming issues, etc.

      Using Netflix's 25Mbps for 4k, that works out to 187.5MB of storage 
space. At current RAM prices, you can buy a 256MB module for $15 full retail... 
so places like Samsung can probably buy them in quantity for less than $2. 
Seems like it would be worth it to pay an extra $10 for a TV/DVD/PS4/Wii-U 
device that could handle 60 seconds of video.

      Travis

      On 12/9/2014 5:34 PM, Sterling Jacobson via Af wrote:

        That’s pretty cool.

         

        You can do 4k direct from Youtube.

         

        Several of the ones I’ve tested are sustained around 20-30Mbps.

         

        But on my network it tends to burst to 90Mbps then sit around for a 
while, then burst back to 90Mbps.

         

        I think the 4k will require a lot of optimizations before it works on 
the built in TV’s.

         

         

         

        From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jerry Richardson 
via Af
        Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 5:12 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon 
streaming 4K now.

         

        Lovely

         

        From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ryan Ghering via Af
        Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 3:38 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon streaming 4K 
now.

         

        http://www.cnet.com/news/amazon-starts-4k-uhd-streams/


         

        -- 

        Ryan Ghering
        Network Operations - Plains.Net
        Office: 970-848-0475 - Cell: 970-630-1879

       

     

   

   





   

  -- 

  All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the 
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't 
get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a 
hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925





   

  -- 

  Ryan Ghering
  Network Operations - Plains.Net
  Office: 970-848-0475 - Cell: 970-630-1879

Reply via email to