"The ban on throttling is necessary both to fulfill the reasonable
expectations of a customer who signs up for a broadband service that
promises access to all of the lawful Internet, and to avoid gamesmanship
designed to avoid the no-blocking rule by, for example, rendering an
application effectively, but not technically, unusable. It prohibits the
degrading of Internet traffic based on source, destination, or content."
Seems pretty clear.
I have a competitor that was using a Procera device to degrade Youtube by
throttling streams back to SD (though it seems like they stopped sometime
since I last checked the Youtube VQR). Seems like that wouldn't be
considered reasonable network management under this.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not sure why.
>
> If you talk to the man on the street, they're going to interpret this as
> "everyone should get 1 Gbps to every device in the nation", and that the
> cost should be $9.99 per month.
>
> That's not the reality. So in reality, ISPs will continue to do bandwidth
> management to accommodate what is actually possible on a case-by-case basis.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 3/12/2015 9:12 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
> Procera is gonna hate this I think.
>
> *From:* Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 12, 2015 9:59 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Light Reading
>
> Something to do this weekend.
>
>
>
