There will have to be some "cost of entry", otherwise every Tom, Dick, &
Harry is going to call him/herself an internet provider so that s/he can
hang his/her doomaflotchy on a pole.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 3/12/2015 1:06 PM, Bruce Robertson wrote:
The point is, now you don't have to go through that hassle.
On 03/12/2015 12:45 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Not that exciting as if I wanted those, I'd just file to be a CLEC.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
*To: *[email protected]
*Sent: *Thursday, March 12, 2015 2:37:47 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Light Reading
Y’all now have the rights to pole contacts and rights of way. Even
though it says ROWs controlled by a utility, I am pretty sure that
public entities cannot discriminate against all you
telecommunications providers and have to treat you equal to the
others. Just cite “network neutrality” rules if they balk.
56. Section 224: Ensuring Infrastructure Access. For broadband
Internet access service, we
do not forbear from section 224 and the Commission’s associated
procedural rules (to the extent they
apply to telecommunications carriers and services and are, thus,
within the Commission’s forbearance
authority).53 Section 224 of the Act governs the Commission’s
regulation of pole attachments. In
particular, section 224(f)(1) requires utilities to provide cable
system operators and telecommunications
carriers the right of “nondiscriminatory access to any pole, duct,
conduit, or right-of-way owned or
controlled” by a utility.54 Access to poles and other infrastructure
is crucial to the efficient deployment of
communications networks including, and perhaps especially, new entrants.
!DSPAM:2,5501ecfa184921480014006!
