I would have to dig it out, it appears to me the whole thing was set aside for now for the smaller operators. We are now BIAS providers. Basic Internet Access Service. And the CDNs and Googles of the world are now all Edge Providers. And we are all part of the Public Switched Telephone Network (without the switching) so that was renamed PTN I think.
Other things are totally off the table like internal content providers. We can prioritize internal services all we want. They are pretty specific about transparency requirements but it would be in everyone’s best interest to describe the exact nature of the offering on your web site. Comcast got a pretty big fine for not being forthcoming about some details of some offerings. From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 11:50 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Consumer Blogs on "Net Neutrality" I thought the exemption was only for the enhanced transparency requirements, not any of the rest of it. From: Chuck McCown Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 12:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Consumer Blogs on "Net Neutrality" I have read the whole thing FCC rule. We all get ROW access, we can only do traffic shaping if we are doing it for technical reasons and not discriminating (we can discriminate, but it has to be all streaming or all browsing or all of one certain type of traffic). And we must, must, must encrypt all customer info. Not just keep it on an internal network, but any spreadsheet you have with customer identifying information must be encrypted. I am not seeing a big impact for WISPS. And you are all exempt until December 15th too if you have less than 100,000 subscribers. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 11:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] Consumer Blogs on "Net Neutrality" Engadget just posted this commentary: http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/19/verizon-net-neutrality/ Not one sided at all, eh?
