We get stuck with all of the CPNI requirements. No more helping out
the kid with his router - the account owner MUST be found! And verify
everything with the super secret password. Ok - so I exaggerate, but
this is going to make things more difficult.
I'm not sure what exactly the point of 'encrypt all customer data' is
given that the front end is still going to be a web interface that
happily decrypts every bit of data and displays it in plain text.
Never let logic get in the way of a bureaucrat implementing a
politicians talking points.
Mark
On 3/19/15 1:50 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
I thought the exemption was only for the enhanced transparency
requirements, not any of the rest of it.
*From:* Chuck McCown <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Thursday, March 19, 2015 12:47 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Consumer Blogs on "Net Neutrality"
I have read the whole thing FCC rule. We all get ROW access, we can
only do traffic shaping if we are doing it for technical reasons and
not discriminating (we can discriminate, but it has to be all
streaming or all browsing or all of one certain type of traffic).
And we must, must, must encrypt all customer info. Not just keep it
on an internal network, but any spreadsheet you have with customer
identifying information must be encrypted. I am not seeing a big
impact for WISPS. And you are all exempt until December 15th too if
you have less than 100,000 subscribers.
*From:* Jason McKemie <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Thursday, March 19, 2015 11:43 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Consumer Blogs on "Net Neutrality"
Engadget just posted this commentary:
http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/19/verizon-net-neutrality/
Not one sided at all, eh?
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
[email protected] 419.837.5015 x 1021
