Just read (skimmed) most of this… interesting. At the end of the day though, it still has the same practical limitations of NAT as for as the end CPE device (user) is concerned. It just “creates/enables” the standard by which it gets handled on the private side of the carrier’s network. “Transient NAT” might be a better name for it, IMO
Paul From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 9:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat Has its own address space distinct from RFC1918. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6598 From: Paul McCall<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 7:58 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat What is “carrier grade” NAT? From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Darin Steffl Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 8:27 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat You are not assigned a Public IP on any cellular carriers anymore. They user carrier grade NAT. In some cases, you can pay for a Static IP to get around the NAT. On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 6:01 PM, TJ Trout <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Is it me or does verizon wireless nat customers and not allow inbound traffic? i.e. hosting a server, I just setup a mikrotik connected to the internet via a usb modem and I can't even ping or login to it's IP -- Darin Steffl Minnesota WiFi www.mnwifi.com<http://www.mnwifi.com/> 507-634-WiFi [http://www.snoitulosten.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/facebook-small.jpg]<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
