Anyone have issues with Verizon dropping VPN connections? It always worked fine when I was rooted and using VPNRoot, but I had to swap my phone and the new software doesn't have an exploit yet. The stock VPN app will connect long enough to load a page then disconnect. I have to re-connect like ten or twenty times just to accomplish a task.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > I couldn't find any official pricing, but what I saw for Sprint just > mentioned the $3/month. > > > https://www.sprint.com/business/solutions/sprint_enablers/sprint_datalink_and_static_ip/index.html#.VQ7SEO7F-ts > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *[email protected] > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Sunday, March 22, 2015 9:27:42 AM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat > > If you wanted an static IP on cellular network they will charge you 500 > dollars to set it up then 3-5 dollars an month for an the static IP. > Source: > > > http://www.verizonwireless.com/businessportals/support/faqs/DataServices/faq_static_ip.html > > https://www.wireless.att.com/businesscenter/solutions/connectivity/ip-addressing.jsp > > so I dont know if you want to set up static IP address with verizon with > that deep setup cost. > > > On 2015-03-21 22:40, John Woodfield wrote: > > That is kind of what I was thinking. > > > > John Woodfield, President > > > > Delmarva WiFi Inc. > > > > 410-870-WiFi > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:38pm > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat > > > > I think probably yes, but as not routable beyond your network. It’s > > space that should never exist in customer networks or the public > > Internet. And since it’s not publicly routable, I can use it, you > > can use it, Comcast and Verizon can use it over and over. > > > > So instead of picking some obscure range in RFC1918 space like > > 10.199.x.x to hand out to your customers and hoping none of them use > > those addresses internally, you could use the CGN space. > > > > I’m sure there is additional stuff that I don’t understand that > > makes it “carrier grade”. > > > > FROM: John Woodfield > > SENT: Saturday, March 21, 2015 9:17 PM > > TO: [email protected] > > SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat > > > > So is this address space available for our use? > > > > 100.64.0.0/10 > > > > John Woodfield, President > > > > Delmarva WiFi Inc. > > > > 410-870-WiFi > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "TJ Trout" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 7:01pm > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat > > > > Is it me or does verizon wireless nat customers and not allow inbound > > traffic? i.e. hosting a server, I just setup a mikrotik connected to > > the internet via a usb modem and I can't even ping or login to it's IP > >
