If you wanted an static IP on cellular network they will charge you 500
dollars to set it up then 3-5 dollars an month for an the static IP.
Source:
http://www.verizonwireless.com/businessportals/support/faqs/DataServices/faq_static_ip.html
https://www.wireless.att.com/businesscenter/solutions/connectivity/ip-addressing.jsp
so I dont know if you want to set up static IP address with verizon with
that deep setup cost.
On 2015-03-21 22:40, John Woodfield wrote:
That is kind of what I was thinking.
John Woodfield, President
Delmarva WiFi Inc.
410-870-WiFi
-----Original Message-----
From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:38pm
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat
I think probably yes, but as not routable beyond your network. It’s
space that should never exist in customer networks or the public
Internet. And since it’s not publicly routable, I can use it, you
can use it, Comcast and Verizon can use it over and over.
So instead of picking some obscure range in RFC1918 space like
10.199.x.x to hand out to your customers and hoping none of them use
those addresses internally, you could use the CGN space.
I’m sure there is additional stuff that I don’t understand that
makes it “carrier grade”.
FROM: John Woodfield
SENT: Saturday, March 21, 2015 9:17 PM
TO: [email protected]
SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat
So is this address space available for our use?
100.64.0.0/10
John Woodfield, President
Delmarva WiFi Inc.
410-870-WiFi
-----Original Message-----
From: "TJ Trout" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 7:01pm
To: [email protected]
Subject: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat
Is it me or does verizon wireless nat customers and not allow inbound
traffic? i.e. hosting a server, I just setup a mikrotik connected to
the internet via a usb modem and I can't even ping or login to it's IP
