I do pptp to my home MT. No problems. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 22, 2015 11:02 AM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyone have issues with Verizon dropping VPN connections? It always > worked fine when I was rooted and using VPNRoot, but I had to swap my phone > and the new software doesn't have an exploit yet. The stock VPN app will > connect long enough to load a page then disconnect. I have to re-connect > like ten or twenty times just to accomplish a task. > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I couldn't find any official pricing, but what I saw for Sprint just >> mentioned the $3/month. >> >> >> https://www.sprint.com/business/solutions/sprint_enablers/sprint_datalink_and_static_ip/index.html#.VQ7SEO7F-ts >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *[email protected] >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Sunday, March 22, 2015 9:27:42 AM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat >> >> If you wanted an static IP on cellular network they will charge you 500 >> dollars to set it up then 3-5 dollars an month for an the static IP. >> Source: >> >> >> http://www.verizonwireless.com/businessportals/support/faqs/DataServices/faq_static_ip.html >> >> https://www.wireless.att.com/businesscenter/solutions/connectivity/ip-addressing.jsp >> >> so I dont know if you want to set up static IP address with verizon with >> that deep setup cost. >> >> >> On 2015-03-21 22:40, John Woodfield wrote: >> > That is kind of what I was thinking. >> > >> > John Woodfield, President >> > >> > Delmarva WiFi Inc. >> > >> > 410-870-WiFi >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> >> > Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:38pm >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat >> > >> > I think probably yes, but as not routable beyond your network. It’s >> > space that should never exist in customer networks or the public >> > Internet. And since it’s not publicly routable, I can use it, you >> > can use it, Comcast and Verizon can use it over and over. >> > >> > So instead of picking some obscure range in RFC1918 space like >> > 10.199.x.x to hand out to your customers and hoping none of them use >> > those addresses internally, you could use the CGN space. >> > >> > I’m sure there is additional stuff that I don’t understand that >> > makes it “carrier grade”. >> > >> > FROM: John Woodfield >> > SENT: Saturday, March 21, 2015 9:17 PM >> > TO: [email protected] >> > SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat >> > >> > So is this address space available for our use? >> > >> > 100.64.0.0/10 >> > >> > John Woodfield, President >> > >> > Delmarva WiFi Inc. >> > >> > 410-870-WiFi >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: "TJ Trout" <[email protected]> >> > Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 7:01pm >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat >> > >> > Is it me or does verizon wireless nat customers and not allow inbound >> > traffic? i.e. hosting a server, I just setup a mikrotik connected to >> > the internet via a usb modem and I can't even ping or login to it's IP >> >> >
