I'm not sure that it really gains much if anything as far as interference rejection... I've read that even though the interfering V/H signals are going to be 3db weaker, you're now going to be seeing two signals (assuming dual polarity H/V interference) at that same signal level and the two combined is essentially the same as seeing the extra 3db. Hopefully someone who actually knows can confirm whether or not that's true.
if that is the case, I think dual slant is mostly only going to help with multipath issues. On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > Well if I can gain 3db by turning 45/45 I'm all over that. > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> That's what everyone keeps saying =) >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 3db right? >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Rejection from other V/H radios. >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Anybody know what you give up by using V/H instead of dual slant with >>>>> the AF5X? >>>>> >>>>> If the path has clear LOS and no multipath, I can't see why it would >>>>> care or even be able to tell the difference. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
