I don’t think the 3 dB thing works. One interfering signal at 0 dB, or two interfering signals at –3 dB each, amount to the same thing.
Probably you mean some sort of fancy interference cancelling algorithm that relies on seeing the same interference on both polarizations? From: Jeremy Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 2:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF5X polarization Well if I can gain 3db by turning 45/45 I'm all over that. On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: That's what everyone keeps saying =) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: 3db right? On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: Rejection from other V/H radios. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: Anybody know what you give up by using V/H instead of dual slant with the AF5X? If the path has clear LOS and no multipath, I can't see why it would care or even be able to tell the difference.
