Yeah, I knew about the multipath advantages. It seemed to me that 3db of rejection would increase your CINR by 3db. Am I wrong here? Chuck?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure that it really gains much if anything as far as interference > rejection... I've read that even though the interfering V/H signals are > going to be 3db weaker, you're now going to be seeing two signals (assuming > dual polarity H/V interference) at that same signal level and the two > combined is essentially the same as seeing the extra 3db. Hopefully someone > who actually knows can confirm whether or not that's true. > > if that is the case, I think dual slant is mostly only going to help with > multipath issues. > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well if I can gain 3db by turning 45/45 I'm all over that. >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> That's what everyone keeps saying =) >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> 3db right? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Rejection from other V/H radios. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Anybody know what you give up by using V/H instead of dual slant with >>>>>> the AF5X? >>>>>> >>>>>> If the path has clear LOS and no multipath, I can't see why it would >>>>>> care or even be able to tell the difference. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
