The labor, hassle, reputation hit, etc for trying to get 1700+ customers to change technical things on their gear would be extensive.
On April 15, 2015 2:24:18 AM AKDT, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: >Why avoid PPPoE? Don’t want to deal with the authentication component? > Just curious… > > > >/30’s – maybe use /31’s ? > > > >From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds >Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 8:33 PM >To: af@afmug.com >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Providing public routed IPs to customers > > > >Trying to avoid PPPoE, for one. Also want to not do a bunch of /30's >everywhere like we are now. > > > > >Josh Reynolds >CIO, SPITwSPOTS >www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> > >On 04/14/2015 04:30 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: > >I use DHCP on my fiber network and PPPoE on wireless. > >On Tuesday, April 14, 2015, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com ><mailto:j...@spitwspots.com> > wrote: > >For those of you currently providing public/routed ips to customers? >What is your topology like and delivery method? > >Looking at doing a few things, have considered a few options, and >wanted to look out there and see what other people are doing. > >Thanks > >-- >Josh Reynolds >CIO, SPITwSPOTS >www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> > > -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
