I've been seeing 1-2ms on out AF5x link, not quite as good as an AF5 in FDD, but better than any other synced radio I've seen.
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:03 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) < [email protected]> wrote: > I have one AF5 up running FDD in the DFS band at 3.4 miles. We didn't want > to try to push an AF24 that far. RTT average is around 0.8ms, so yes, like > a licensed radio. > > No idea about the AF5X, haven't bought any. But I'd guess latency would be > similar to the AF5 or 24 in half-duplex mode, which is going to be like > 4-5ms. I have only done FDD though.. because it's moar better. > > On 5/4/2015 5:53 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > >> So I assume latency in FDD mode is sub millisecond like a licensed >> backhaul? >> >> What's is latency like on the AF5X? Similar to a PTP600, a few >> milliseconds and very constant? >> >> >> -----Original Message----- From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) >> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 5:48 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF5 vs AF5X >> >> No FDD. Not 48 volt. Not 40+ watts. >> >> On 5/4/2015 5:45 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >> >>> Can someone point me to a concise explanation somewhere of the >>> difference between AF5 and AF5X? Where you would use each, and what you >>> give up with the X in return for smaller, cheaper, lower power, and drop-in >>> replacement for a Rocket? >>> >>> I know it doesn't have the built-in high isolation TX and RX antennas, >>> and doesn't do a gig of throughput. But I'm sure there's more to it. It's >>> not jumping out at me on the UBNT website. >>> >>> >> >> >
