The Rx and Tx Channel ranges are the same.... Chuck
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Jon Langeler <[email protected]> wrote: > In Ubiquiti's version of FDD, is it different channel range for the Rx? > The risk there is anyone else sees that channel as clear. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 4, 2015, at 11:03 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've been seeing 1-2ms on out AF5x link, not quite as good as an AF5 in > FDD, but better than any other synced radio I've seen. > > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:03 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I have one AF5 up running FDD in the DFS band at 3.4 miles. We didn't >> want to try to push an AF24 that far. RTT average is around 0.8ms, so yes, >> like a licensed radio. >> >> No idea about the AF5X, haven't bought any. But I'd guess latency would >> be similar to the AF5 or 24 in half-duplex mode, which is going to be like >> 4-5ms. I have only done FDD though.. because it's moar better. >> >> On 5/4/2015 5:53 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >> >>> So I assume latency in FDD mode is sub millisecond like a licensed >>> backhaul? >>> >>> What's is latency like on the AF5X? Similar to a PTP600, a few >>> milliseconds and very constant? >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) >>> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 5:48 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF5 vs AF5X >>> >>> No FDD. Not 48 volt. Not 40+ watts. >>> >>> On 5/4/2015 5:45 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>> >>>> Can someone point me to a concise explanation somewhere of the >>>> difference between AF5 and AF5X? Where you would use each, and what you >>>> give up with the X in return for smaller, cheaper, lower power, and drop-in >>>> replacement for a Rocket? >>>> >>>> I know it doesn't have the built-in high isolation TX and RX antennas, >>>> and doesn't do a gig of throughput. But I'm sure there's more to it. It's >>>> not jumping out at me on the UBNT website. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
