While I have seen that work with AF24, I am not sure I have seen it work with AF5/5U. Certainly not a recommended mode of operation....
Chuck On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe the question was can TX and RX be set to the same frequency on > the AF5 in FDD mode, given that it is using separate antennas rather than a > diplexer. > > *From:* Chuck Macenski <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 05, 2015 9:49 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF5 vs AF5X > > The Rx and Tx Channel ranges are the same.... > > Chuck > > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Jon Langeler <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> In Ubiquiti's version of FDD, is it different channel range for the Rx? >> The risk there is anyone else sees that channel as clear. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On May 4, 2015, at 11:03 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I've been seeing 1-2ms on out AF5x link, not quite as good as an AF5 in >> FDD, but better than any other synced radio I've seen. >> >> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:03 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I have one AF5 up running FDD in the DFS band at 3.4 miles. We didn't >>> want to try to push an AF24 that far. RTT average is around 0.8ms, so yes, >>> like a licensed radio. >>> >>> No idea about the AF5X, haven't bought any. But I'd guess latency would >>> be similar to the AF5 or 24 in half-duplex mode, which is going to be like >>> 4-5ms. I have only done FDD though.. because it's moar better. >>> >>> On 5/4/2015 5:53 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>> >>>> So I assume latency in FDD mode is sub millisecond like a licensed >>>> backhaul? >>>> >>>> What's is latency like on the AF5X? Similar to a PTP600, a few >>>> milliseconds and very constant? >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) >>>> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 5:48 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF5 vs AF5X >>>> >>>> No FDD. Not 48 volt. Not 40+ watts. >>>> >>>> On 5/4/2015 5:45 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>> >>>>> Can someone point me to a concise explanation somewhere of the >>>>> difference between AF5 and AF5X? Where you would use each, and what you >>>>> give up with the X in return for smaller, cheaper, lower power, and >>>>> drop-in >>>>> replacement for a Rocket? >>>>> >>>>> I know it doesn't have the built-in high isolation TX and RX antennas, >>>>> and doesn't do a gig of throughput. But I'm sure there's more to it. >>>>> It's >>>>> not jumping out at me on the UBNT website. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
