Which is where ePMP comes in. you get reasonable cost and sync... which makes good spectrum management a lot easier.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps, but at 1000x the cost. > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd suggest with careful spectrum management, proper loading, AND >> better equipment you'd still be better off. >> >> I have 22 towers with over a hundred UBNT APs in a valley 11 miles >> wide, built over the top of a synced Canopy network. I take about 10 >> customers a week off of their 450 platform and we are constantly told that >> the difference is night and day better on our network. Careful spectrum >> management and proper AP loading wins over sync every time. >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> No, we can't always control that, but if I can at least control it >>> sometimes, I'll take it. >>> >>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> And you have the opinion you can control that, constantly, on >>>> unlicensed spectrum? >>>> >>>> *smirk* >>>> >>>> Josh Reynolds >>>> CIO, SPITwSPOTSwww.spitwspots.com >>>> >>>> On 05/15/2015 05:46 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>>> >>>> That's a very good point, regardless of what some customers seem to >>>> think, mbps really isn't the most important thing... >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've always considered mbps to be among the least important concerns >>>>> on PTMP, well below packet loss, jitter, QoS features, manageability, >>>>> consistency, and reliability. Which is why I'm not super keen on *any* of >>>>> the wifi stuff. This seems is like an argument about whether a Pinto is >>>>> better than a Fiesta. >>>>> </smug> >>>>> >>>>> One could say "I can sync but I can only get 60 Mbps per sub" (*) >>>>> >>>>> Another person could say "I can't sync but I can get 200+ Mbps per >>>>> sub" (*) >>>>> >>>>> (*) under the right conditions >>>>> >>>>> Your market and deployment strats will dictate which is more important. >>>>> >>>>> Josh Reynolds >>>>> CIO, SPITwSPOTSwww.spitwspots.com >>>>> >>>>> On 05/15/2015 04:56 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: >>>>> >>>>> But no sync. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *Peter Kranz >>>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 3:12 PM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> AC blows doors on ePMP >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Peter Kranz *www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> >>>>> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 <510-868-1614%20x100> >>>>> Mobile: 510-207-0000 >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *Jason McKemie >>>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 11:21 AM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I know this isn't an apples to apples comparison, but what are other's >>>>> thoughts on these two products? I'm looking at 5GHz, and I know the AC >>>>> gear doesn't have the lower 5GHz bands - hopefully they will in the near >>>>> future. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Jason >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
