Ken, I'm certain there are no more type approvals for any 3.65 GHz gear under 
the old Part 90 rules.

Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:[email protected]]<http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>





From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2015 6:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i

It’s still a question I don’t know the answer to.  If any 3650 equipment 
manufacturer, even Mercury or Telrad, wanted to release some new hardware 
variant at this point, could they?  Or are equipment approvals in the same boat 
as NN licenses?


From: George Skorup<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2015 5:40 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i

I think the 450i is only going to be 5GHz.

We'd probably be better off asking WB or KP to make us a 3GHz panel for use 
with the connectorized SM. Or... maybe a slant SuperStinger so we don't have to 
buy the more expensive connectorized SM. That didn't work out so well for 2.4, 
but maybe 3.6 is possible?
On 6/7/2015 5:18 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
I should know the answer, but is there going to be an integrated panel version 
of the 3.65 GHz SM?

My real question, I guess, is whether new equipment approvals can go through 
under the old Part 90 rules?  Or has the FCC essentially frozen the equipment 
market in that band for the next year or so?  An integrated 12-15 inch diamond 
shaped panel would have been nice, although I’d probably settle for some better 
choices of external dual slant panels that don’t cost an arm and a leg but also 
aren’t junk.

Maybe something like this, except it doesn’t seem to actually exist in real 
life, and judging from other Mars panels, would be way too expensive:
http://www.mars-antennas.com/MA-WA36-DP19

From: Matt Mangriotis<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i

Regarding official launch and availability… the PMP 450i is scheduled to be 
publicly announced and officially released in July.  We will have several sets 
of Beta test and demo equipment around in late June, so you’ll be seeing it 
around more at that time.

Matt

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 2:39 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i

Its too bad I did not get 150 of those instead of the regular ones.
next batch I will get a few of em to let our techs install. They are already
had a heads up about this and have been waiting for me to order them.



On 05/29/2015 02:10 PM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:
Nah…  if it were, it would be the i450.


The “i” is very special and means different things to different folks…  this 
thing is much more than just “integrated”.  It’s the next generation of 
hardware, and brings more performance to the table (both physical and RF).

Keep the questions coming.

Matt


On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Mike Hammett 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It's made by Apple.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

________________________________
From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 1:56:09 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i

So....the "i" is for "integrated" antenna?
Or is there something more special about it?








************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************

 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************

Reply via email to