I think they've always had multiple stages of builds with the inner circle always getting more than public beta did.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 2:35:46 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links Which they don't feel confident releasing to anyone anymore... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Josh Reynolds < [email protected] > wrote: Dev build ;) On 2015-06-11 10:38 pm, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: <blockquote> <blockquote> <blockquote> <blockquote> <blockquote> now running at over 100MBps on a 10MHz channel... ??? </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> Is that Air rate you are quoting ? 256QAM on a 10meg channel falls short of 100MBps ... Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] ------------------------- <blockquote> FROM: "Josh Reynolds" < [email protected] > TO: [email protected] SENT: Thursday, June 11, 2015 8:42:24 PM SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links Ours replaced RM5's that wouldn't even link... now running at over 100MBps on a 10MHz channel... Josh Reynolds CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com [1] On 06/11/2015 04:02 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: No it's just the Af5x... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 11, 2015 7:57 PM, "Mike Hammett" < [email protected] > wrote: You seem to have a lot of issues with radios that won't link up. ;-) ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com [7] [8] [9] [10] ------------------------- FROM: "Josh Luthman" < [email protected] > TO: [email protected] SENT: Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:56:12 PM SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links EPTP mode fills the latency fix. My first attempt at AF5x and it won't even register. I'm trying to replace Rockets that link up at -66. I'm told that there's a path issue or bad radio. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 [11] Direct: 937-552-2343 [12] 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 11, 2015 7:45 PM, "George Skorup" < [email protected] > wrote: Why exactly? Just asking. I'm wondering if we should be doing cheap PTP with ePMP or AF5x. I have several Force110 links up (just SMs, not PTP) operating all across the 5GHz bands. And one 10 mile link with Laird 2' dishes using connectorized non-GPS radios. Other than some oddities like intermittent increases in latency, they have all been working very well. Most are still running 2.3.3 and I don't want to touch them because they're working just fine. I'm leaning towards the Force110 PTP radios and whatever antennas required for new links since it fits with all the other Canopy and ePMP stuff (power injection, etc). But the AFs sure are nice when you can do FDD (except the 5X!) and get very low latency like licensed. On 6/11/2015 6:32 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Honestly I think they're better than AF5x at this point. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 [11] Direct: 937-552-2343 [12] 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 11, 2015 7:25 PM, "joseph marsh" < [email protected] > wrote: I got 2 links ready to deploy just sitting the office waiting to go up on the tower On Jun 11, 2015 5:34 PM, "Josh Luthman" < [email protected] > wrote: Uhm...I guess? It hears noise better than Ubnt for sure. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 [11] Direct: 937-552-2343 [12] 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 11, 2015 6:23 PM, "Lewis Bergman" < [email protected] > wrote: Does the force auto select a clean frequency? On Jun 11, 2015 5:13 PM, "Mathew Howard" < [email protected] > wrote: containerized... that must be when you buy a cheap router from walmart in put it on a tower in a rubbermaid container. On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Bill Prince < [email protected] > wrote: You mean connectorized? bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/11/2015 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: The containerized 5 GHz radios do the same throughput </blockquote> Links: ------ [1] http://www.spitwspots.com [2] http://www.ics-il.com [3] https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL [4] https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb [5] https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions [6] https://twitter.com/ICSIL [7] http://www.midwest-ix.com [8] https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix [9] https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange [10] https://twitter.com/mdwestix [11] tel: 937-552-2340 [12] tel: 937-552-2343 </blockquote> -- josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com </blockquote>
