So you have a Dev build that is doing 1024QAM ? 

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: "Faisal Imtiaz" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:32:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links
> 
> Dev build ;)
> 
> On 2015-06-11 10:38 pm, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> >>>>> now running at over 100MBps on a 10MHz channel... ???
> > 
> > Is that Air rate you are quoting ?
> >  256QAM on a 10meg channel falls short of 100MBps ...
> > 
> > Regards.
> > 
> > Faisal Imtiaz
> > Snappy Internet & Telecom
> > 7266 SW 48 Street
> > Miami, FL 33155
> > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
> > 
> > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]
> > 
> > -------------------------
> > 
> >> FROM: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
> >> TO: [email protected]
> >> SENT: Thursday, June 11, 2015 8:42:24 PM
> >> SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links
> >> 
> >> Ours replaced RM5's that wouldn't even link... now running at over
> >> 100MBps on a 10MHz channel...
> >> 
> >> Josh Reynolds
> >> CIO, SPITwSPOTS
> >> www.spitwspots.com [1]
> >> 
> >> On 06/11/2015 04:02 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> >> 
> >> No it's just the Af5x...
> >> 
> >> Josh Luthman
> >> Office: 937-552-2340
> >> Direct: 937-552-2343
> >> 1100 Wayne St
> >> Suite 1337
> >> Troy, OH 45373
> >> On Jun 11, 2015 7:57 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 
> >> You seem to have a lot of issues with radios that won't link up. ;-)
> >> 
> >> -----
> >> Mike Hammett
> >> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >> http://www.ics-il.com [2]
> >> 
> >> [3] [4] [5] [6]
> >> 
> >> Midwest Internet Exchange
> >> http://www.midwest-ix.com [7]
> >> 
> >> [8] [9] [10]
> >> 
> >> -------------------------
> >> 
> >> FROM: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
> >> TO: [email protected]
> >> SENT: Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:56:12 PM
> >> SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links
> >> 
> >> EPTP mode fills the latency fix.
> >> 
> >> My first attempt at AF5x and it won't even register. I'm trying to
> >> replace Rockets that link up at -66. I'm told that there's a path
> >> issue or bad radio.
> >> 
> >> Josh Luthman
> >> Office: 937-552-2340 [11]
> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 [12]
> >> 1100 Wayne St
> >> Suite 1337
> >> Troy, OH 45373
> >> On Jun 11, 2015 7:45 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Why exactly? Just asking. I'm wondering if we should be doing cheap
> >> PTP with ePMP or AF5x. I have several Force110 links up (just SMs,
> >> not PTP) operating all across the 5GHz bands. And one 10 mile link
> >> with Laird 2' dishes using connectorized non-GPS radios. Other than
> >> some oddities like intermittent increases in latency, they have all
> >> been working very well. Most are still running 2.3.3 and I don't
> >> want to touch them because they're working just fine. I'm leaning
> >> towards the Force110 PTP radios and whatever antennas required for
> >> new links since it fits with all the other Canopy and ePMP stuff
> >> (power injection, etc). But the AFs sure are nice when you can do
> >> FDD (except the 5X!) and get very low latency like licensed.
> >> 
> >> On 6/11/2015 6:32 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> >> 
> >> Honestly I think they're better than AF5x at this point.
> >> 
> >> Josh Luthman
> >> Office: 937-552-2340 [11]
> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 [12]
> >> 1100 Wayne St
> >> Suite 1337
> >> Troy, OH 45373
> >> On Jun 11, 2015 7:25 PM, "joseph marsh" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> I got 2 links ready to deploy just sitting the office waiting to go
> >> up on the tower
> >> On Jun 11, 2015 5:34 PM, "Josh Luthman"
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Uhm...I guess? It hears noise better than Ubnt for sure.
> >> 
> >> Josh Luthman
> >> Office: 937-552-2340 [11]
> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 [12]
> >> 1100 Wayne St
> >> Suite 1337
> >> Troy, OH 45373
> >> On Jun 11, 2015 6:23 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Does the force auto select a clean frequency?
> >> On Jun 11, 2015 5:13 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> containerized... that must be when you buy a cheap router from
> >> walmart in put it on a tower in a rubbermaid container.
> >> 
> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> You mean connectorized?
> >> 
> >> bp
> >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
> >> 
> >> On 6/11/2015 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> >> The containerized 5 GHz radios do the same throughput
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Links:
> > ------
> > [1] http://www.spitwspots.com
> > [2] http://www.ics-il.com
> > [3] https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
> > [4] https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
> > [5] https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
> > [6] https://twitter.com/ICSIL
> > [7] http://www.midwest-ix.com
> > [8] https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix
> > [9] https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange
> > [10] https://twitter.com/mdwestix
> > [11] tel:937-552-2340
> > [12] tel:937-552-2343
> 
> --
> josh reynolds :: chief information officer
> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
> 

Reply via email to