First, there is no "air rate" on any air fiber listed, these are FPGAs. Secondly, yes. It may or may not be released. Its been out for awhile.
On Jun 12, 2015 6:10 AM, Faisal Imtiaz <[email protected]> wrote: > > So you have a Dev build that is doing 1024QAM ? > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: "Faisal Imtiaz" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:32:15 AM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links > > > > Dev build ;) > > > > On 2015-06-11 10:38 pm, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > > >>>>> now running at over 100MBps on a 10MHz channel... ??? > > > > > > Is that Air rate you are quoting ? > > > 256QAM on a 10meg channel falls short of 100MBps ... > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > Faisal Imtiaz > > > Snappy Internet & Telecom > > > 7266 SW 48 Street > > > Miami, FL 33155 > > > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > > > > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] > > > > > > ------------------------- > > > > > >> FROM: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> > > >> TO: [email protected] > > >> SENT: Thursday, June 11, 2015 8:42:24 PM > > >> SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links > > >> > > >> Ours replaced RM5's that wouldn't even link... now running at over > > >> 100MBps on a 10MHz channel... > > >> > > >> Josh Reynolds > > >> CIO, SPITwSPOTS > > >> www.spitwspots.com [1] > > >> > > >> On 06/11/2015 04:02 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > >> > > >> No it's just the Af5x... > > >> > > >> Josh Luthman > > >> Office: 937-552-2340 > > >> Direct: 937-552-2343 > > >> 1100 Wayne St > > >> Suite 1337 > > >> Troy, OH 45373 > > >> On Jun 11, 2015 7:57 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> You seem to have a lot of issues with radios that won't link up. ;-) > > >> > > >> ----- > > >> Mike Hammett > > >> Intelligent Computing Solutions > > >> http://www.ics-il.com [2] > > >> > > >> [3] [4] [5] [6] > > >> > > >> Midwest Internet Exchange > > >> http://www.midwest-ix.com [7] > > >> > > >> [8] [9] [10] > > >> > > >> ------------------------- > > >> > > >> FROM: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > > >> TO: [email protected] > > >> SENT: Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:56:12 PM > > >> SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links > > >> > > >> EPTP mode fills the latency fix. > > >> > > >> My first attempt at AF5x and it won't even register. I'm trying to > > >> replace Rockets that link up at -66. I'm told that there's a path > > >> issue or bad radio. > > >> > > >> Josh Luthman > > >> Office: 937-552-2340 [11] > > >> Direct: 937-552-2343 [12] > > >> 1100 Wayne St > > >> Suite 1337 > > >> Troy, OH 45373 > > >> On Jun 11, 2015 7:45 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Why exactly? Just asking. I'm wondering if we should be doing cheap > > >> PTP with ePMP or AF5x. I have several Force110 links up (just SMs, > > >> not PTP) operating all across the 5GHz bands. And one 10 mile link > > >> with Laird 2' dishes using connectorized non-GPS radios. Other than > > >> some oddities like intermittent increases in latency, they have all > > >> been working very well. Most are still running 2.3.3 and I don't > > >> want to touch them because they're working just fine. I'm leaning > > >> towards the Force110 PTP radios and whatever antennas required for > > >> new links since it fits with all the other Canopy and ePMP stuff > > >> (power injection, etc). But the AFs sure are nice when you can do > > >> FDD (except the 5X!) and get very low latency like licensed. > > >> > > >> On 6/11/2015 6:32 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > >> > > >> Honestly I think they're better than AF5x at this point. > > >> > > >> Josh Luthman > > >> Office: 937-552-2340 [11] > > >> Direct: 937-552-2343 [12] > > >> 1100 Wayne St > > >> Suite 1337 > > >> Troy, OH 45373 > > >> On Jun 11, 2015 7:25 PM, "joseph marsh" <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> I got 2 links ready to deploy just sitting the office waiting to go > > >> up on the tower > > >> On Jun 11, 2015 5:34 PM, "Josh Luthman" > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Uhm...I guess? It hears noise better than Ubnt for sure. > > >> > > >> Josh Luthman > > >> Office: 937-552-2340 [11] > > >> Direct: 937-552-2343 [12] > > >> 1100 Wayne St > > >> Suite 1337 > > >> Troy, OH 45373 > > >> On Jun 11, 2015 6:23 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> Does the force auto select a clean frequency? > > >> On Jun 11, 2015 5:13 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> containerized... that must be when you buy a cheap router from > > >> walmart in put it on a tower in a rubbermaid container. > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> You mean connectorized? > > >> > > >> bp > > >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > >> > > >> On 6/11/2015 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > >> The containerized 5 GHz radios do the same throughput > > > > > > > > > > > > Links: > > > ------ > > > [1] http://www.spitwspots.com > > > [2] http://www.ics-il.com > > > [3] https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL > > > [4] https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb > > > [5] https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions > > > [6] https://twitter.com/ICSIL > > > [7] http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > [8] https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix > > > [9] https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange > > > [10] https://twitter.com/mdwestix > > > [11] tel:937-552-2340 > > > [12] tel:937-552-2343 > > > > -- > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com > >
