Which they don't feel confident releasing to anyone anymore...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dev build ;)
>
> On 2015-06-11 10:38 pm, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
>
>> now running at over 100MBps on a 10MHz channel... ???
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> Is that Air rate you are quoting ?
>>  256QAM on a 10meg channel falls short of 100MBps ...
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]
>>
>> -------------------------
>>
>>  FROM: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
>>> TO: [email protected]
>>> SENT: Thursday, June 11, 2015 8:42:24 PM
>>> SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links
>>>
>>> Ours replaced RM5's that wouldn't even link... now running at over
>>> 100MBps on a 10MHz channel...
>>>
>>> Josh Reynolds
>>> CIO, SPITwSPOTS
>>> www.spitwspots.com [1]
>>>
>>> On 06/11/2015 04:02 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>
>>> No it's just the Af5x...
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Jun 11, 2015 7:57 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> You seem to have a lot of issues with radios that won't link up. ;-)
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com [2]
>>>
>>> [3] [4] [5] [6]
>>>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com [7]
>>>
>>> [8] [9] [10]
>>>
>>> -------------------------
>>>
>>> FROM: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>>> TO: [email protected]
>>> SENT: Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:56:12 PM
>>> SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links
>>>
>>> EPTP mode fills the latency fix.
>>>
>>> My first attempt at AF5x and it won't even register. I'm trying to
>>> replace Rockets that link up at -66. I'm told that there's a path
>>> issue or bad radio.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 [11]
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 [12]
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Jun 11, 2015 7:45 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why exactly? Just asking. I'm wondering if we should be doing cheap
>>> PTP with ePMP or AF5x. I have several Force110 links up (just SMs,
>>> not PTP) operating all across the 5GHz bands. And one 10 mile link
>>> with Laird 2' dishes using connectorized non-GPS radios. Other than
>>> some oddities like intermittent increases in latency, they have all
>>> been working very well. Most are still running 2.3.3 and I don't
>>> want to touch them because they're working just fine. I'm leaning
>>> towards the Force110 PTP radios and whatever antennas required for
>>> new links since it fits with all the other Canopy and ePMP stuff
>>> (power injection, etc). But the AFs sure are nice when you can do
>>> FDD (except the 5X!) and get very low latency like licensed.
>>>
>>> On 6/11/2015 6:32 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>
>>> Honestly I think they're better than AF5x at this point.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 [11]
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 [12]
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Jun 11, 2015 7:25 PM, "joseph marsh" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I got 2 links ready to deploy just sitting the office waiting to go
>>> up on the tower
>>> On Jun 11, 2015 5:34 PM, "Josh Luthman"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Uhm...I guess? It hears noise better than Ubnt for sure.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 [11]
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 [12]
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Jun 11, 2015 6:23 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Does the force auto select a clean frequency?
>>> On Jun 11, 2015 5:13 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> containerized... that must be when you buy a cheap router from
>>> walmart in put it on a tower in a rubbermaid container.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> You mean connectorized?
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>> On 6/11/2015 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>> The containerized 5 GHz radios do the same throughput
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] http://www.spitwspots.com
>> [2] http://www.ics-il.com
>> [3] https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
>> [4] https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
>> [5] https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
>> [6] https://twitter.com/ICSIL
>> [7] http://www.midwest-ix.com
>> [8] https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix
>> [9] https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange
>> [10] https://twitter.com/mdwestix
>> [11] tel:937-552-2340
>> [12] tel:937-552-2343
>>
>
> --
> josh reynolds :: chief information officer
> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
>

Reply via email to