Correct telrad -108 would be a -78 for canopy/epmp/ubnt

I was amazed because we couldn't see the tower, it's skimming a hill and
going thru a bush while sitting in the truck at ground level.  We tried 450
from the roof and couldn't get a signal.

-Sean


On Saturday, June 13, 2015, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

>   I think Patrick said to add 30 dB to Telrad signal numbers because they
> were “per subcarrier” or something?
>
>  *From:* Colin Stanners
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 13, 2015 4:17 PM
> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Do you want to see this stuff here?
>
>  Patrick, I haven't been following Telrad but that's too incredible - I
> can't see how -108, which is below the noise floor for any reasonable
> channel bandwidth (20mhz+?) could get any reasonable speed, much less
> those.
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Patrick Leary <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>>  Should I resist sharing this sort of thing? If it's out of line, let me
>> know Chuck.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> [mailto:
>> [email protected]
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] On Behalf Of
>> Steve Discher
>> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:51 PM
>> To: [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
>> Subject: [Telrad] Another Telrad success story
>>
>>
>>
>> Not to flood the list with these but Zirkel is having great results.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
>> viruses.
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
>> computer viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to