RSRP, it is a measurement. It is a truer number than RSSI, which is only an estimate (so I'm told). As Ken said, basically add 30 to get an idea of the RSSI value.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID On Jun 13, 2015 5:36 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: Yeah... something like that. Notice that is -108 CINR, not RSSI, like the numbers we're all used to. On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I think Patrick said to add 30 dB to Telrad signal numbers because they were “per subcarrier” or something? From: Colin Stanners<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 4:17 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Do you want to see this stuff here? Patrick, I haven't been following Telrad but that's too incredible - I can't see how -108, which is below the noise floor for any reasonable channel bandwidth (20mhz+?) could get any reasonable speed, much less those. On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Patrick Leary <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Should I resist sharing this sort of thing? If it's out of line, let me know Chuck. [cid:0E2DE6CC4411406C902C6E13D144BBDF@khohhofVAIO] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Steve Discher Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:51 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [Telrad] Another Telrad success story Not to flood the list with these but Zirkel is having great results. ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************ ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************ ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************ ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************
