How does LTE penetrate hills? This is the second or third "through a hill"
story in the last week?

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Patrick Leary <[email protected]>
wrote:

>  RSRP, it is a measurement. It is a truer number than RSSI, which is only
> an estimate (so I'm told). As Ken said, basically add 30 to get an idea of
> the RSSI value.
>
>  *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID*
>  On Jun 13, 2015 5:36 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:
>  Yeah... something like that. Notice that is -108 CINR, not RSSI, like
> the numbers we're all used to.
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>   I think Patrick said to add 30 dB to Telrad signal numbers because
>> they were “per subcarrier” or something?
>>
>>  *From:* Colin Stanners <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, June 13, 2015 4:17 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Do you want to see this stuff here?
>>
>>   Patrick, I haven't been following Telrad but that's too incredible - I
>> can't see how -108, which is below the noise floor for any reasonable
>> channel bandwidth (20mhz+?) could get any reasonable speed, much less
>> those.
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Patrick Leary <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  Should I resist sharing this sort of thing? If it's out of line, let
>>> me know Chuck.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>>> Behalf Of Steve Discher
>>> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:51 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [Telrad] Another Telrad success story
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Not to flood the list with these but Zirkel is having great results.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ************************************************************************************
>>>
>>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
>>> viruses.
>>>
>>>
>>> ************************************************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ************************************************************************************
>>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
>>> computer viruses.
>>>
>>> ************************************************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
> viruses.
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
> viruses.
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
>

Reply via email to