Yes 3.65 canopy 450 wouldn't connect.
On Saturday, June 13, 2015, Caleb Knauer <[email protected]> wrote: > 3.65 450? > > Crazy performance. Let us know what it does with the final install. > > Sweet truck too. Lots of truck talk lately. Thinking I need some new > wheels. > > On Saturday, June 13, 2015, Sean Heskett <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Correct telrad -108 would be a -78 for canopy/epmp/ubnt >> >> I was amazed because we couldn't see the tower, it's skimming a hill and >> going thru a bush while sitting in the truck at ground level. We tried 450 >> from the roof and couldn't get a signal. >> >> -Sean >> >> >> On Saturday, June 13, 2015, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I think Patrick said to add 30 dB to Telrad signal numbers because >>> they were “per subcarrier” or something? >>> >>> *From:* Colin Stanners >>> *Sent:* Saturday, June 13, 2015 4:17 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Do you want to see this stuff here? >>> >>> Patrick, I haven't been following Telrad but that's too incredible - I >>> can't see how -108, which is below the noise floor for any reasonable >>> channel bandwidth (20mhz+?) could get any reasonable speed, much less >>> those. >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Patrick Leary <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Should I resist sharing this sort of thing? If it's out of line, let >>>> me know Chuck. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>>> Behalf Of Steve Discher >>>> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:51 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [Telrad] Another Telrad success story >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Not to flood the list with these but Zirkel is having great results. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ************************************************************************************ >>>> >>>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >>>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer >>>> viruses. >>>> >>>> >>>> ************************************************************************************ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ************************************************************************************ >>>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >>>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >>>> computer viruses. >>>> >>>> ************************************************************************************ >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > -- > -- > IgniteNet > [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > www.ignitenet.com > We're hiring! Ping me. >
