Their support certainly has not. On Tuesday, June 23, 2015, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think Calix has come down over time. > > *From:* Cassidy B. Larson > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:33 AM > *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why? > > Are you scared of vendor lock-in with PON? That’s what scares me. Calix > jacking up their rates without any recourse but swapping equipment on both > sides. > > > > On Jun 23, 2015, at 10:08 AM, KevinR <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > Chuck, > > Can you tell us what vendors are working for you? > I know you have said you have tried a few. > > > > > > > On Jun 23, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > The more PON we do, the more I like it. > > Regards, > Chuck > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> PON to the desktop would only have active gear in the NOC and in the >> device. Everything between is passive. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> Midwest Internet Exchange >> http://www.midwest-ix.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Nate Burke" <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> *To: *[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> *Sent: *Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:16:36 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why? >> >> >> But Why? I understand Long haul PON for FTTH, to conserve miles and >> miles of trunk fiber, but why in a building? Instead of having a single >> device (a switch) you now have active hardware all over the building to >> manage and maintain (And power). >> >> >> On 6/23/2015 10:08 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> >> PON looks to be where people are going for fiber to the desktop. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> Midwest Internet Exchange >> http://www.midwest-ix.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Nate Burke" mailto:[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> *To: *"Animal Farm" mailto:[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> *Sent: *Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:49:14 AM >> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why? >> >> We just had a new public library built here in town. The entire LAN >> infrastructure is built on PON using the Tellabs ONT's. >> http://www01.tellabs.com/products/tellabs1100ont.shtml I've briefly >> looked around their site, and read some case studies, but Why would you >> choose PON infrastructure in a single building? From what I can tell, >> you still have to run CAT 5 to the ONT for power, and the 4 port units >> (which I saw several around the library) have a wall-wort and a power >> switch. I'm having trouble wrapping my head around the concept, other >> than someone make a slick presentation, and someone else got a nice >> payoff. I wouldn't be surprised of the Latter, every single 120v outlet >> in the building is a 20A duplex receptacle with USB Ports (~$30 each) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
