Thanks George, I was initially worried that I would break something inside
by forcing the screw farther down. I'll try doing that now. I've found 3
more so far in this batch.


On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:59 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/Screws-not-in-all-the-way-cannot-close-SM/m-p/42441#U42441
>
> We have a whole bunch of these. Just use the force and screw the hell out
> of any that have the phillips head screws installed. I've been able to make
> them all work.
>
> On 8/21/2015 10:54 PM, Ryan Ray wrote:
>
> So I'm setting up 30 new 3.65 SM's and I'm at number 10 and so far I've
> got one where the cover will not seal because instead of the proper screw
> at the top someone replaced it with a huge phillips head which stops the
> cover from properly going on.
>
> The second unit I was taking the cap off and the tab broke after putting a
> tiny bit of pressure on it to get the cap off.
>
> In another batch I have a 2.4 with a radio not calibrated message and one
> where the antenna was not spot welded on so it just rattles around inside
> the case.
>
> Some serious quality control needs to happen Cambium. This is the worst
> I've ever seen. What's the RMA process now? I'm going to go through the
> other 20 of these radios and I guess I need to batch ship a bunch of broken
> / poor quality / EXPENSIVE PAPERWEIGHTS back...
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Matt Mangriotis <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It could have affected PTP 450 units as well.  We will definitely let you
>> know if it has.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 3:43 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New Cambium 450 SM's dying after a couple of days
>> with"ADI communication error"
>>
>> > Sorry for not talking about this much, but during our investigation,
>> > we wanted to make sure we were covering all the bases.  It does appear
>> > to be an isolated manufacturing defect.  We are working to narrow down
>> > and publish the MAC address list of potentially affected units, and
>> > should have this within a few days.
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, this could be a latent issue, and units may not fail
>> > right away.  More details to follow.
>>
>> Great news that we will have a list.  Will this affect any PTP450 units?
>> Thanks!
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to