Statistically, you're more likely to be killed by a drunk or distracted driver than someone with a gun.

Mathew Howard wrote:
Oh, I agree... the world would be better if we could get rid of bad drivers. I have to agree with what Patrick said, cops should focus more on ticketing bad drivers, and not so much on randomly giving out tickets on highways where everyone (including cops...) speeds.

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Glen Waldrop <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I dunno...

    I think the world would be a better place if bad drivers weren't
    allowed to drive. They need to retest or something every decade or
    so, maybe just once they get more than one violation. I don't
    know, but too many people drive like idiots just to get to the red
    light one second faster than the next guy. Maybe they just all
    need to get off their butts and build a race car, get it out of
    their system.

        ----- Original Message -----
        *From:* Mathew Howard <mailto:[email protected]>
        *To:* af <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent:* Saturday, October 10, 2015 5:54 PM
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings

        Yes... realistically, the same standards wouldn't work here.
        If we had the same requirements to be able to drive, half the
        population wouldn't have any way to get to work (or wherever
        it is they need to go) everyday. Thousands of lives would be
        saved every year from the reduction in traffic deaths, but I'm
        pretty sure there would be very, very little support from
        anyone for changing our driving standards to something similar
        to what Germany has.

        On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Patrick Leary
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        wrote:

            I lived in Germany. There, people pay good money to earn
            the privilege to drive. You must be 18 and it costs well
            over a grand. As a result, German drivers are predictable.
            You’ll never see a German driver passing on the right.
            You’ll never see a German driver holding up traffic in a
            left or even middle lane. You won’t see a German change
            lanes without using their indicator. And of course,
            Germans respect that government has a job and is not the
            enemy, so they don’t reject taxation for infrastructure.
            As a result, Germany has MUCH better roads than we do.
            Seriously. The German autobahn is twice as thick and
            better banked. To be fair, we have thousands of miles more
            of Interstate, so we do have a harder job. Still. Also,
            you can’t drive a jalopy in Germany, which has strict
            inspection rules, that even include aesthetics, but the
            emphasis is on safe functioning.

            We can’t realistically have the same regime though, we
            have much larger distances and lots of backroads and farms
            and country roads. I think we don’t need the same standard
            of road, but we do need roads that are well-maintained,
            and we need much better driving skills. Our cops should
            focus less on cherry-picking speed traps (many areas here
            in FL are nationally famous for bullshit speed traps –
            e.g. Waldo, FL) and more on ticketing bad drivers.

            Driver etiquette is the real differentiator between the
            U.S. and Germany. A German won’t say, “I’m driving the
            speed limit so screw you, go around.” Germans, like other
            Europeans, understand they have a civic responsibility.
            Too many Americans reject civic responsibility as being
            “against freedom” and “un-American.” The closest parallel
            in the U.S. to how the Germans behave is the Mormon
            population, which places a very high premium on civic
            responsibility, public dignity, decency, the idea of body
            politic as one functioning unit. The concept of the Hive
            (ergo, Chuck’s Beehive).

            -Patrick

            *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard
            *Sent:* Saturday, October 10, 2015 4:32 PM
            *To:* af <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings

            What's right for one country, isn't necessarily right for
            another. While I would love to be able to drive as fast I
            think is safe, knowing how the typical American drives,
            I'd guess that it would be far more deadly here than in
            Germany. I suspect the same logic applies to other stuff
            to some extent.

            On Oct 10, 2015 11:05 AM, "Stefan Englhardt"
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Countrys with weak gun control have more shot people.
                Simple logic in my eyes.

                Nothing to say against if the majority of a country
                takes this into account. Just strange in

                the eyes of a foreign citizen.

                In my country you can buy a BMW and drive as fast as
                you think it is ok on highways.

                this kills, too. Same arguments here. It is the
                freedom to drive.

                *Von:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>] *Im Auftrag von *Mike
                Hammett
                *Gesendet:* Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015 16:47
                *An:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings

                Except that most mass shootings are done with weapons
                that were obtained in circumstances that even the most
                strict of control laws would allow. The weapons
                painted as being so evil just plain aren't used in
                these situations.

                Logic doesn't lead you to gun control.



                -----
                Mike Hammett
                Intelligent Computing Solutions
                http://www.ics-il.com

                
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                *From: *"Darin Steffl" <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>>
                *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                *Sent: *Saturday, October 10, 2015 8:12:08 AM
                *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings

                I carry a .380 pistol with me most of the time but I
                only own three guns myself. I also consider myself to
                have many Democratic views when it comes to gun policy
                and Republican views with taxes & business aspects.

                I personally think it should be MUCH harder to
                purchase a firearm than it is. When I purchased my new
                glock, I ordered it online at Gander Mountain and
                walked into the store, they did a quick background
                check and I walked out in 10 minutes. It was great to
                me as a consumer and easy. BUT, what if I was angry or
                in the heat of the moment and wanted to harm people.
                Now that easy gun purchase allowed me to walk out the
                same day with a deadly weapon.

                I do not think our government is trying to take guns
                away as the crazy Republicans like to lie about. I do
                think we should have much stricter gun control though
                to keep the nutty people from having easy access. All
                that is going to do is make it take longer to purchase
                a legal firearm, which I am perfectly fine with if it
                prevents even one shooting death or mass shooting.

                If there's other policies being proposed that can help
                limit access to guns, I'm all for it if it still
                allows me to purchase a pistol to carry legally and a
                shotgun to go hunting. I don't believe I should be
                allowed to own a machine gun type weapon for use at my
                home. Weapons like that should be allowed only at
                shooting ranges and locked up under heavy security.
                They do not belong at a residential home anywhere for
                sport or home protection.

                So anyway, I think there are gun nuts out there that
                like to walk around while open carrying and say Obama
                is trying to steal all our guns. I think they're crazy
                and need a bonk on the head to come to your senses.
                Try acting normal and conceal your weapon, don't talk
                like a crazy gun nut and try to realize you don't need
                a machine gun.

                The government's job is to protect as many citizens as
                possible. That means more laws, more enforcement, and
                more compliance. We can't easily identify and stop all
                people who will commit a shooting crime. We can more
                easily target guns themselves and prevent the sale of
                them to as many "bad" people as possible. For "good"
                and legal people who want to buy one, stop complaining
                about gun control and embrace it in order to help save
                lives. Gun control isn't meant for good people, only
                the bad people. You'll still be able to buy any weapon
                you "need" in order to hunt or protect your home.

                On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Gino Villarini
                <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                    Freedom is not the exercise to choose whatever you
                    want.  Heck then free all the child molesters!
                    Human beings need to be controlled, that the whole
                    reasoning behind laws. Im with Jaime and Stefan on
                    this.

                    On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Mike Hammett
                    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                        There are many items that kill more humans
                        than first world guns.



                        -----
                        Mike Hammett
                        Intelligent Computing Solutions
                        http://www.ics-il.com

                        
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                        *From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]
                        <mailto:[email protected]>>
                        *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                        *Sent: *Friday, October 9, 2015 11:21:43 PM
                        *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings

                        Looking at this with a foreign view I can't
                        understand this "gun love" in US. It is not
                        all about the criminals or idiots. Just look
                        at the statistics for accidents with weapons.
                        The only way to save lifes is to be very
                        restrictive. If someone wants to shoot he can
                        go to a shooting club and leave the weapon
                        there. It is not freedom to have a gun at
                        home. It is silly esp. with kids around.

                        You can't avoid killing with banning weapons
                        but you can reduce it. If I need a weapon I
                        call for police or security.



--
                Darin Steffl

                Minnesota WiFi

                www.mnwifi.com <http://www.mnwifi.com/>

                507-634-WiFi

                <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on
                Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>




            
************************************************************************************
            This footnote confirms that this email message has been
            scanned by
            PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code,
            vandals & computer viruses.
            
************************************************************************************





            
************************************************************************************
            This footnote confirms that this email message has been
            scanned by
            PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code,
            vandals & computer viruses.
            
************************************************************************************




Reply via email to