Thanks Mike. Yes the aggregates Mike quoted are roughly correct as well, but…it’s a bit different when you’re using our Auto-TDMA mode. Assuming you’re not fully loaded, users running speedtests get results at a Gigabit in up and down direction and around 1 ms RT latency, so it feels higher speed aggregate since we’re adapting to actual usage on the fly. In other words we fill up the underutilized directional demand with the direction that’s in demand (usually downstream of course).
That’s opposed to locking down the MAC/PHY layer at 50/50 like FDD does, or 75/25 TDMA modes, etc. Jaime From: Af <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mike Hammett <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 2:33 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] B11 copper v fiber Yes. 1200 - 1500 aggregate. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ________________________________ From: "TJ Trout" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 2:00:16 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] B11 copper v fiber Jamie; Is the b11 based on 802.11 silicone? Is the b11 capable of 750fd or 1500fd? Thank you On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: And Mike quits sending you nasty emails because you think copper was sent to us by an evil entity from another dimension. Rory From: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:27 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] B11 copper v fiber Two reasons: 1) Peace of mind regarding future EMI problems 2) It's pretty sexy these days to tell people you have fiber to the antenna, On 10/21/2015 1:35 PM, Scott Vander Dussen wrote: Mimosa recommends these SFP modules: AFBR-5710APZ<http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Avago-Technologies/AFBR-5710APZ/?qs=%2fha2pyFaduhaC58MVLqFl44%252bx6hS5cz1YhojZqdUVyI7Wp%252bPDPG4Rg%3d%3d>ï¿1Ž2 1.25 GBd MMF Transceiver for Gigabit Ethernet, SFP, Bail de-latch, Ext Temp (-40 to 85C) AFCT-5715ALZ<http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Avago-Technologies/AFCT-5715ALZ/?qs=%2fha2pyFadujhJvt9bnk9ES81EX7WBD7ZrbBItK6kCZLHNEN0X0r%2fGA%3d%3d> 1.25 GBd SMF Transceiver with DMI for Gigabit Ethernet, SFP, Std de-latch, Ext Temp (-40 to 85C) FTLF8519P3BTL<http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Finisar/FTLF8519P3BTL/?qs=%2fha2pyFaduh7nd4n5kIrSHIvC1uJRiq8EwAcMil5upKcc76M2JIwDQ%3d%3d> Fiber Optic Transmitters, Receivers, Transceivers GigE 1x/2x FC, 2.129 Gb/s trnscvr, 550m FTLF1318P3BTL<http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Finisar/FTLF1318P3BTL/?qs=%2fha2pyFaduikXVilIKTQvJhiq4n%2fsUYWQAU7K0qEJnA1f%252bqIw1quUw%3d%3d> Fiber Optic Transmitters, Receivers, Transceivers 1310nmFP GigE 1x FC 1.25Gb/s trnscvr10km ï¿1Ž2 Assuming cable length and EMI are not issues, is there any benefit to using fiber over copper? ï¿1Ž2 `S
