I do not see the direct DC connector on any of the marketing photos. Do these still need to be powered via POE?
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jaime Fink <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Mike. > > Yes the aggregates Mike quoted are roughly correct as well, but…it’s a bit > different when you’re using our Auto-TDMA mode. Assuming you’re not fully > loaded, users running speedtests get results at a Gigabit in up and down > direction and around 1 ms RT latency, so it feels higher speed aggregate > since we’re adapting to actual usage on the fly. In other words we fill up > the underutilized directional demand with the direction that’s in demand > (usually downstream of course). > > That’s opposed to locking down the MAC/PHY layer at 50/50 like FDD does, > or 75/25 TDMA modes, etc. > > Jaime > > From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Mike Hammett < > [email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 2:33 PM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] B11 copper v fiber > > Yes. > > 1200 - 1500 aggregate. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"TJ Trout" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Wednesday, October 21, 2015 2:00:16 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] B11 copper v fiber > > Jamie; > > Is the b11 based on 802.11 silicone? > > Is the b11 capable of 750fd or 1500fd? > > Thank you > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> And Mike quits sending you nasty emails because you think copper was sent >> to us by an evil entity from another dimension. >> >> >> >> Rory >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett >> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:27 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] B11 copper v fiber >> >> >> >> Two reasons: >> >> 1) Peace of mind regarding *future* EMI problems >> 2) It's pretty sexy these days to tell people you have fiber to the >> antenna, >> >> On 10/21/2015 1:35 PM, Scott Vander Dussen wrote: >> >> Mimosa recommends these SFP modules: >> >> AFBR-5710APZ >> <http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Avago-Technologies/AFBR-5710APZ/?qs=%2fha2pyFaduhaC58MVLqFl44%252bx6hS5cz1YhojZqdUVyI7Wp%252bPDPG4Rg%3d%3d>ï¿1Ž2 >> 1.25 GBd MMF Transceiver for Gigabit Ethernet, SFP, Bail de-latch, Ext Temp >> (-40 to 85C) >> >> AFCT-5715ALZ >> <http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Avago-Technologies/AFCT-5715ALZ/?qs=%2fha2pyFadujhJvt9bnk9ES81EX7WBD7ZrbBItK6kCZLHNEN0X0r%2fGA%3d%3d> >> 1.25 GBd SMF Transceiver with DMI for Gigabit Ethernet, SFP, Std de-latch, >> Ext Temp (-40 to 85C) >> >> FTLF8519P3BTL >> <http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Finisar/FTLF8519P3BTL/?qs=%2fha2pyFaduh7nd4n5kIrSHIvC1uJRiq8EwAcMil5upKcc76M2JIwDQ%3d%3d> >> Fiber Optic Transmitters, Receivers, Transceivers GigE 1x/2x FC, 2.129 Gb/s >> trnscvr, 550m >> >> FTLF1318P3BTL >> <http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Finisar/FTLF1318P3BTL/?qs=%2fha2pyFaduikXVilIKTQvJhiq4n%2fsUYWQAU7K0qEJnA1f%252bqIw1quUw%3d%3d> >> Fiber Optic Transmitters, Receivers, Transceivers 1310nmFP GigE 1x FC >> 1.25Gb/s trnscvr10km >> >> ï¿1Ž2 >> >> Assuming cable length and EMI are not issues, is there any benefit to >> using fiber over copper? >> >> ï¿1Ž2 >> >> `S >> >> >> > > >
