English is considered the business language in Far East and many parts of the world. My friend Eric Lee speaks it like a Brit as do most of my buddies from India....kind of cool
Jaime Solorza On Oct 22, 2015 9:08 AM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> wrote: > Chinese is more popular than English and Spanish combined... > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> I am universal ...my circle of friends span the globe and on weekends >> other realms...world too small to only speak 'merican.....đ >> >> Jaime Solorza >> On Oct 22, 2015 8:56 AM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Uhm...'merica! >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Jaime Solorza < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> doesn't speak pachuco ese Holmes? Just Spanish...boring >>>> >>>> Jaime Solorza >>>> Wireless Systems Architect >>>> 915-861-1390 >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think you can change your language dictionary on the fly with >>>>> Android. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Jaime Solorza < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> agreed smartphones seem to think they are smarter than us....and for >>>>>> those of us that write in several languages its worse.....pinchi telefono >>>>>> chafa >>>>>> >>>>>> Jaime Solorza >>>>>> Wireless Systems Architect >>>>>> 915-861-1390 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Usually you can decipher what was intended before mangling by auto >>>>>>> correct, but âBethesdaâ has me stumped. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> >>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 22, 2015 8:55 AM >>>>>>> *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> >>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 2 wireless APs on bridged Mikrotik ports >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OK. That auto correct is just pitiful. I am really going to have to >>>>>>> stop sending mail to this list on my phone. I am obviously not >>>>>>> qualified to >>>>>>> do so. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Having not Used UniFi, does it do a clean job of this? âŚ. >>>>>>>> Switching between APs as needed and keeping it all straight MAC table >>>>>>>> wise? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Lewis >>>>>>>> Bergman >>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 22, 2015 9:41 AM >>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 2 wireless APs on bridged Mikrotik ports >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry Ken. I summer you don't have 2 Bethesda in house to set it up >>>>>>>> in a lab. I would think shortening the time is your best bet. Now how >>>>>>>> short.... No idea. ARP traffic is tiny so I can't imagine that causing >>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>> issue. Maybe a cpu issue on all sides trying to keep up with them? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015, 8:38 AM Josh Luthman < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That was Ken's :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2015 9:37 AM, "Paul McCall" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 on Joshâs suggestions >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh >>>>>>>> Luthman >>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 22, 2015 9:27 AM >>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 2 wireless APs on bridged Mikrotik ports >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope, you already have my suggestion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you try your idea of a 10s timeout? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2015 12:28 AM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There are 4 SSIDs. But customer has each device âjoinâ each SSID. >>>>>>>> I expected the devices to pick one SSID and stay with it down to 1 >>>>>>>> bar, but >>>>>>>> they seem very fickle. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or are you saying make all the SSIDs the same? I donât think it >>>>>>>> matters, there are 4 wireless networks, even if they are all named the >>>>>>>> same. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:03 PM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 2 wireless APs on bridged Mikrotik ports >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why not do 4 SSIDs? Add the profiles once and then done. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think your issue is probably the APs, not the bridge/switch part >>>>>>>> but it doesn't really help. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Oct 21, 2015 11:59 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have a customer who insisted he needed 2 dual band wireless APs >>>>>>>> 25 feet apart in his ranch house. So we have a managed non-WiFi >>>>>>>> Mikrotik >>>>>>>> RB2011 in his basement, feeding two Netgear routers in wireless AP >>>>>>>> mode. I >>>>>>>> have the LAN ports bridged rather than using the switch chips, since >>>>>>>> there's plenty of CPU power and it gives more visibility into the >>>>>>>> traffic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So counting 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, the customer has 4 SSIDs and I think >>>>>>>> his devices like iPads are jumping back and forth between networks. >>>>>>>> And I >>>>>>>> think bad things are happening because the bridging table can't keep >>>>>>>> track >>>>>>>> of which port the clients are on. I see weird things like the same >>>>>>>> amount >>>>>>>> of traffic going out the ports to both wireless APs. I never see a MAC >>>>>>>> address on both bridge ports, but it is acting like the Mikrotik is >>>>>>>> flooding traffic to both ports. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Should I be tweaking parameters like reducing the ageing time below >>>>>>>> the default 5 minutes? Should I be using the switch chips and not >>>>>>>> bridging? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is this a typical problem when devices can choose between multiple >>>>>>>> APs close together on the same bridged LAN? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Lewis Bergman >>>>>>> 325-439-0533 Cell >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
