Voice quality for one....it echos or audio quality is crappy. We replaced my mums TWC with fixed cellular and an ATT landline. Better all around. When I was at district with had hybrid system. The pots one had almost zero issues. The main office went to Cisco and after a few months went back to pots. At time we had 45 x 45 symmetrical link...now they have 1Gbps link.... At district our boss ran a flat network which probably contributed to much of this....not sure what they have now... On Nov 18, 2015 5:19 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I though you were going to say.... > > I am old school, I don't answer the phone, I let my assistant answer it ! > > LOL !.. > > What attribute do you associate with VOIP that yo don't like ? > > Regards. > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> > *To: *"Animal Farm" <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:15:02 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Phone System > > Actually I am old school...I still don't like VoIP systems... Especially > TWC version > On Nov 18, 2015 5:04 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Is that the type of phone you are using? >> On Nov 18, 2015 3:47 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Their UTM firewalls are outstanding, support impeccable, RMA process >>> superb. Firmware updates are a PITA because of the random changes, like >>> taking out DHCP relay from the GUI requiring CLI. Their sizing calculator >>> is pretty spot on. They do a decent trade in for competitor replacement, >>> just send a serial and certificate of destruction. >>> It does suck if you dont do the maintenance contract you lose some of >>> the UTM like webfiltering >>> They have some 3com partnership, or they bought hem, something to that >>> effect. >>> Their switches are a bit big for the britches, I wasnt impressed. >>> >>> It can get pricey though >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Interesting …. Anyone use Fortinet gear for anything else? They keep >>>> hitting my radar for certain applications but have no real hands on with >>>> it…. They seem to make a lot of options… >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy >>>> /sarcasm >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 18, 2015 5:34 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Phone System >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> we do fortinet only >>>> >>>> You can do it without a problem >>>> >>>> its a good system as long as you realize is a voip pbx in a box, its >>>> not as configurable as some, but thats the beauty, you have a clear line of >>>> can do and cannot do >>>> >>>> Its designed to be an end user system as in you sell it to a customer >>>> and they manage it through their support contract with fortinet >>>> >>>> We have one customer who did that, he has had good success with self >>>> management, and hes a dolt at times. >>>> >>>> They bought Talkswitch so its actually a rebranded but seasoned system >>>> >>>> The virtual pbx is more scalable, but without conversion hardware it >>>> doesnt do pots >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Matt <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> We are looking at upgrading our phone system. Looking at Fortinet. >>>> We have two locations now with separate phone numbers. Wanting to >>>> link the systems over Internet so we can help each other out when one >>>> location or other has too many lines ringing. >>>> >>>> What is everyone else using for a phone system and how do they like it? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >
