Most voice traffic in the world is VoIP or a variant of VoIP. You just have bad 
experiences with shit systems. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 


----- Original Message -----

From: "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> 
To: "Animal Farm" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 6:36:33 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System 


Voice quality for one....it echos or audio quality is crappy. We replaced my 
mums TWC with fixed cellular and an ATT landline. Better all around. When I was 
at district with had hybrid system. The pots one had almost zero issues. The 
main office went to Cisco and after a few months went back to pots. At time we 
had 45 x 45 symmetrical link...now they have 1Gbps link.... At district our 
boss ran a flat network which probably contributed to much of this....not sure 
what they have now... 
On Nov 18, 2015 5:19 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" < [email protected] > wrote: 





I though you were going to say.... 



I am old school, I don't answer the phone, I let my assistant answer it ! 



LOL !.. 



What attribute do you associate with VOIP that yo don't like ? 



Regards. 



Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 




<blockquote>
From: "Jaime Solorza" < [email protected] > 
To: "Animal Farm" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:15:02 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System 




<blockquote>

Actually I am old school...I still don't like VoIP systems... Especially TWC 
version 
On Nov 18, 2015 5:04 PM, "Jaime Solorza" < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>

Is that the type of phone you are using? 
On Nov 18, 2015 3:47 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < [email protected] > 
wrote: 

<blockquote>

Their UTM firewalls are outstanding, support impeccable, RMA process superb. 
Firmware updates are a PITA because of the random changes, like taking out DHCP 
relay from the GUI requiring CLI. Their sizing calculator is pretty spot on. 
They do a decent trade in for competitor replacement, just send a serial and 
certificate of destruction. 
It does suck if you dont do the maintenance contract you lose some of the UTM 
like webfiltering 

They have some 3com partnership, or they bought hem, something to that effect. 
Their switches are a bit big for the britches, I wasnt impressed. 

It can get pricey though 



On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Paul Stewart < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>



Interesting …. Anyone use Fortinet gear for anything else? They keep hitting my 
radar for certain applications but have no real hands on with it…. They seem to 
make a lot of options… 

From: Af [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm 
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 5:34 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System 


we do fortinet only 

You can do it without a problem 

its a good system as long as you realize is a voip pbx in a box, its not as 
configurable as some, but thats the beauty, you have a clear line of can do and 
cannot do 

Its designed to be an end user system as in you sell it to a customer and they 
manage it through their support contract with fortinet 

We have one customer who did that, he has had good success with self 
management, and hes a dolt at times. 

They bought Talkswitch so its actually a rebranded but seasoned system 

The virtual pbx is more scalable, but without conversion hardware it doesnt do 
pots 





On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Matt < [email protected] > wrote: 


<blockquote>

We are looking at upgrading our phone system. Looking at Fortinet. 
We have two locations now with separate phone numbers. Wanting to 
link the systems over Internet so we can help each other out when one 
location or other has too many lines ringing. 

What is everyone else using for a phone system and how do they like it? 
</blockquote>






-- 




If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. 
</blockquote>



-- 




If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. 
</blockquote>

</blockquote>


</blockquote>

</blockquote>

Reply via email to