Bxr not bm
On Nov 18, 2015 9:26 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> wrote:
> From your mouth to God's ears. I have an SWR for small gigs... A Fender
> BMX with two cabinets (2 10s and 1 15 inch with horn) for larger venues...a
> Fender 30 with 10 in for rehearsals and a Peavey with 10 inch in bedroom
> for practice. Working on harmonic methods I picked up from Talking Bass
> and Vic Wooten websites. We played a show last year where all the amps
> were original 1960s Fenders!!!!!All tube amps.. I played my Yamaha through
> a Dual Showman ...keyboard and guitarist played through Twin Reverbs....my
> favorite amp was a Standell 100 watt with a Fender Bassman cabinet. My
> best rig technically was in late 70s...Furman Sound preamp with a
> parametric equalizer fed into a crossover..fed high and mids to 250 watt
> QSC amp powering a cabinet with 4 10 inch Kustom speakers and 500 watt QSC
> amp feeding an Acoustic cabinet with JBL dual 15s...my Rickenbacker 4001
> was rewired from traditional rotosound to split stereo... My treble signal
> fed into a Mutron BiPhase. We played Yes Rush star castle Renaissance for
> a while. Then funk and disco {fun for bassist s) ....sold it all when I
> got married. Tube amps are expensive and hard to maintain
> On Nov 18, 2015 9:04 PM, "Daniel White" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> After years of reading Jaime’s posts… its clear he is an Audiophile. I
>> bet he only plays with tube amps as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> Digital just doesn’t have the warm sound of analog…
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/feb10/articles/analoguewarmth.htm
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>>
>>
>> Daniel White
>>
>> [email protected]
>>
>> Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590
>>
>> Skype: danieldwhite
>> Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84>: Twitter
>> <https://twitter.com/DanielWhite84>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 18, 2015 6:37 PM
>> *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Phone System
>>
>>
>>
>> Voice quality for one....it echos or audio quality is crappy. We
>> replaced my mums TWC with fixed cellular and an ATT landline. Better all
>> around. When I was at district with had hybrid system. The pots one had
>> almost zero issues. The main office went to Cisco and after a few months
>> went back to pots. At time we had 45 x 45 symmetrical link...now they
>> have 1Gbps link.... At district our boss ran a flat network which probably
>> contributed to much of this....not sure what they have now...
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2015 5:19 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I though you were going to say....
>>
>>
>>
>> I am old school, I don't answer the phone, I let my assistant answer it !
>>
>>
>>
>> LOL !..
>>
>>
>>
>> What attribute do you associate with VOIP that yo don't like ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *"Animal Farm" <[email protected]>
>> *Sent: *Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:15:02 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Phone System
>>
>> Actually I am old school...I still don't like VoIP systems... Especially
>> TWC version
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2015 5:04 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Is that the type of phone you are using?
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2015 3:47 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Their UTM firewalls are outstanding, support impeccable, RMA process
>> superb. Firmware updates are a PITA because of the random changes, like
>> taking out DHCP relay from the GUI requiring CLI. Their sizing calculator
>> is pretty spot on. They do a decent trade in for competitor replacement,
>> just send a serial and certificate of destruction.
>>
>> It does suck if you dont do the maintenance contract you lose some of the
>> UTM like webfiltering
>>
>> They have some 3com partnership, or they bought hem, something to that
>> effect.
>>
>> Their switches are a bit big for the britches, I wasnt impressed.
>>
>>
>>
>> It can get pricey though
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Interesting …. Anyone use Fortinet gear for anything else? They keep
>> hitting my radar for certain applications but have no real hands on with
>> it…. They seem to make a lot of options…
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy
>> /sarcasm
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 18, 2015 5:34 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Phone System
>>
>>
>>
>> we do fortinet only
>>
>> You can do it without a problem
>>
>> its a good system as long as you realize is a voip pbx in a box, its not
>> as configurable as some, but thats the beauty, you have a clear line of can
>> do and cannot do
>>
>> Its designed to be an end user system as in you sell it to a customer and
>> they manage it through their support contract with fortinet
>>
>> We have one customer who did that, he has had good success with self
>> management, and hes a dolt at times.
>>
>> They bought Talkswitch so its actually a rebranded but seasoned system
>>
>> The virtual pbx is more scalable, but without conversion hardware it
>> doesnt do pots
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Matt <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> We are looking at upgrading our phone system. Looking at Fortinet.
>> We have two locations now with separate phone numbers. Wanting to
>> link the systems over Internet so we can help each other out when one
>> location or other has too many lines ringing.
>>
>> What is everyone else using for a phone system and how do they like it?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>
>>
