450i AP will interop with 430 SMs. You don't need to swap the SMs out right away.
Thanks, Sriram ________________________________________ From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:24 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP How about 450i AP to 430 SM? I would like to start deploying 450i instead of 450 for 430 upgrade projects. Do I have to get all of the 430 SM’s swapped first? Mark > On Nov 27, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Aaron Schneider > <[email protected]> wrote: > > It should work, but at the moment I can’t recall if/when we tried this with > PTP mode. I’ll let you know. > > 450i - 450 isn’t really an “interop” situation like 430 - 450 was. 430 - 450 > was quite a bit different, needing SISO to talk to MIMO with the way we did > MIMO at first (MIMO-B using both channels for data). 450i - 450 is much more > similar, and we have been using that combination internally for a long time. > It wasn’t part of the initial release of 450i due to needing to focus on the > HW release itself. > > I’ll be in touch on the PTP question. It is important to allow you to > upgrade a PTP link one end at a time. > > Regards, > -Aaron > > > > > On 11/27/15, 12:09 AM, "Af on behalf of George Skorup" <[email protected] > on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > >> I thought interop was only for PMP? >> >> On 11/26/2015 11:38 PM, Matt wrote: >>> Is it possible for a PTP450i master to talk to a PTP450 slave now? >> >
