Yes you can, Mark. ________________________________________ From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 12:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
We have a number of towers to convert from 4 450’s with 90 degree sectors to 6 AP’s with 60 degree sectors. Most of these are already at 80-90% 450 SM’s. I was asking if I can go directly to 450i AP’s without having to finish collecting the 430’s. Mark > On Nov 28, 2015, at 11:35 AM, Sriram Chaturvedi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Chuck, I was directly responding to Mark’s question on 430 “upgrade” > project where I assumed he was eventually going to upgrade his 430 SMs to > 450/450i. Perhaps it was an incorrect assumption. Believe it or not, my > responses aren’t loaded when I post here. > > >> On Nov 28, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> "right away" sounds ominous >> >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Sriram Chaturvedi >> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:00 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP >> >> 450i AP will interop with 430 SMs. You don't need to swap the SMs out right >> away. >> >> Thanks, >> Sriram >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]> >> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:24 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP >> >> How about 450i AP to 430 SM? I would like to start deploying 450i >> instead of 450 for 430 upgrade projects. Do I have to get all of the 430 >> SM�s swapped first? >> >> Mark >> >> >>> On Nov 27, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Aaron Schneider >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> It should work, but at the moment I can�t recall if/when we tried this >>> with PTP mode. I�ll let you know. >>> >>> 450i - 450 isn�t really an �interop� situation like 430 - 450 was. >>> 430 - 450 was quite a bit different, needing SISO to talk to MIMO with the >>> way we did MIMO at first (MIMO-B using both channels for data). 450i - 450 >>> is much more similar, and we have been using that combination internally >>> for a long time. It wasn�t part of the initial release of 450i due to >>> needing to focus on the HW release itself. >>> >>> I�ll be in touch on the PTP question. It is important to allow you to >>> upgrade a PTP link one end at a time. >>> >>> Regards, >>> -Aaron >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 11/27/15, 12:09 AM, "Af on behalf of George Skorup" >>> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I thought interop was only for PMP? >>>> >>>> On 11/26/2015 11:38 PM, Matt wrote: >>>>> Is it possible for a PTP450i master to talk to a PTP450 slave now? >>>> >> > >
