I imagine at some point, the 430 SMs will be like the old P8 SMs. You
will want to get them off of the network to keep the overall sector
capacity in check.
On 11/28/2015 1:05 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi wrote:
Yes you can, Mark.
________________________________________
From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 12:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
We have a number of towers to convert from 4 450�s with 90 degree sectors to
6 AP�s with 60 degree sectors. Most of these are already at 80-90% 450
SM�s. I was asking if I can go directly to 450i AP�s without having to
finish collecting the 430�s.
Mark
On Nov 28, 2015, at 11:35 AM, Sriram Chaturvedi
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Chuck, I was directly responding to Mark�s question on 430 �upgrade�
project where I assumed he was eventually going to upgrade his 430 SMs to
450/450i. Perhaps it was an incorrect assumption. Believe it or not, my
responses aren�t loaded when I post here.
On Nov 28, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
"right away" sounds ominous
-----Original Message----- From: Sriram Chaturvedi
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
450i AP will interop with 430 SMs. You don't need to swap the SMs out right
away.
Thanks,
Sriram
________________________________________
From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
How about 450i AP to 430 SM? I would like to start deploying 450i instead
of 450 for 430 upgrade projects. Do I have to get all of the 430 SM�s
swapped first?
Mark
On Nov 27, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Aaron Schneider
<[email protected]> wrote:
It should work, but at the moment I can�t recall if/when we tried this with
PTP mode. I�ll let you know.
450i - 450 isn�t really an �interop� situation like 430 - 450 was. 430 -
450 was quite a bit different, needing SISO to talk to MIMO with the way we did
MIMO at first (MIMO-B using both channels for data). 450i - 450 is much more
similar, and we have been using that combination internally for a long time.
It wasn�t part of the initial release of 450i due to needing to focus on the
HW release itself.
I�ll be in touch on the PTP question. It is important to allow you to
upgrade a PTP link one end at a time.
Regards,
-Aaron
On 11/27/15, 12:09 AM, "Af on behalf of George Skorup" <[email protected] on
behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
I thought interop was only for PMP?
On 11/26/2015 11:38 PM, Matt wrote:
Is it possible for a PTP450i master to talk to a PTP450 slave now?
