Very much like that already. We watch frame utilization and as it gets high we hunt down high usage 430's and swap those out, and fix any 450's running with poor signals.
There isn't a lot of point to swapping out low usage 430's so it's nice that we are able to leave them if we decide to deploy 450i Mark > On Nov 28, 2015, at 5:40 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > > I imagine at some point, the 430 SMs will be like the old P8 SMs. You will > want to get them off of the network to keep the overall sector capacity in > check. > >> On 11/28/2015 1:05 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi wrote: >> Yes you can, Mark. >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]> >> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 12:35 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP >> >> We have a number of towers to convert from 4 450�s with 90 degree sectors >> to 6 AP�s with 60 degree sectors. Most of these are already at 80-90% >> 450 SM�s. I was asking if I can go directly to 450i AP�s without >> having to finish collecting the 430�s. >> >> Mark >> >>> On Nov 28, 2015, at 11:35 AM, Sriram Chaturvedi >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Chuck, I was directly responding to Mark�s question on 430 >>> �upgrade� project where I assumed he was eventually going to upgrade >>> his 430 SMs to 450/450i. Perhaps it was an incorrect assumption. Believe it >>> or not, my responses aren�t loaded when I post here. >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 28, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> "right away" sounds ominous >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: Sriram Chaturvedi >>>> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:00 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP >>>> >>>> 450i AP will interop with 430 SMs. You don't need to swap the SMs out >>>> right away. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Sriram >>>> >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:24 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP >>>> >>>> How about 450i AP to 430 SM? I would like to start deploying 450i >>>> instead of 450 for 430 upgrade projects. Do I have to get all of the 430 >>>> SM�s swapped first? >>>> >>>> Mark >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Nov 27, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Aaron Schneider >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It should work, but at the moment I can�t recall if/when we tried this >>>>> with PTP mode. I�ll let you know. >>>>> >>>>> 450i - 450 isn�t really an �interop� situation like 430 - 450 was. >>>>> 430 - 450 was quite a bit different, needing SISO to talk to MIMO with >>>>> the way we did MIMO at first (MIMO-B using both channels for data). 450i >>>>> - 450 is much more similar, and we have been using that combination >>>>> internally for a long time. It wasn�t part of the initial release of >>>>> 450i due to needing to focus on the HW release itself. >>>>> >>>>> I�ll be in touch on the PTP question. It is important to allow you to >>>>> upgrade a PTP link one end at a time. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> -Aaron >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 11/27/15, 12:09 AM, "Af on behalf of George Skorup" >>>>>> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I thought interop was only for PMP? >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/26/2015 11:38 PM, Matt wrote: >>>>>>> Is it possible for a PTP450i master to talk to a PTP450 slave now? >
