Bunch of people use Freeside on some good sized companies...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 9, 2015 5:14 PM, "Vlad Sedov" <[email protected]> wrote:

> is it just me, or does the rest of the ISP world just looks at you like
> you're retarded when you mention freeside?
>
> Sure, it's not 100% bug-free, but it's constantly developed and updated.
> There is a commercial installation option, as well as a simple DIY route
> using a canned VM, or, if you have a reasonable amount of linux/perl
> skills, you can just install it yourself (which is what we did ten years
> ago).
> Freeside works well enough for a several thousand sub ISP, and includes
> all the features you would expect in an ISP billing system -- ticketing,
> reports, provisioning, self-service, etc etc..
>
> cheers
>
> vlad
>
>
> On 12/9/2015 4:04 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
>
> Brett,
>
> After reading over this thread thoroughly, I don't think you understand
> how great your life would be if you paid the small amount that one of these
> billing/customer management systems cost. Wispmon, VISP, Azotel, powercode,
> Sonar, etc. The cost is nearly nothing and it saves you TIME. What is your
> time valued at? I value my time between $150-200 if someone wants me to do
> the work personally. With the time that Azotel saves us today with only
> using a handful of their features, it more than pays for itself in labor
> costs. We will probably look at Sonar once it is more finished and utilize
> even more of the features, saving even more hours every month. I'd say for
> every $1,000 a month we spend on a billing system, we'll save at least
> $2,000 in labor costs every month and it will help us collect money much
> faster and not give out free internet to no pays.
>
> You are not thinking straight if you think you're going to develop a FREE
> billing system that does everything you want accurately without bugs that
> need to be fixed over time. You have upfront cost to develop such a system
> and then ongoing maintenance to add new features and support it. Your cost
> and frustration is going to be much worse than just picking one of the big
> WISP billing providers out there, I promise you that.
>
> If you are too stubborn to listen to the WISP's here that have already
> gone through your process, good luck to you sir. You're not the "first" one
> to have the idea of building their own system and the smart ones decided
> against it and went with an established provider and don't regret it at all.
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Cameron Crum <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Well then, best of luck in your endeavors!
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Brett A Mansfield <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The research I did was very extensive. Wispmon in particular has their
>>> pricing right on their website (which I love by the way. I wish everyone
>>> would).
>>>
>>> You say that billing is the most important part of my business. I
>>> respectfully disagree. It is actually one of the least important. The
>>> product I'm selling is by far the most important, and the customer service
>>> is next. Billing only happens after the first two are met.
>>>
>>> You mentioned several other things:
>>>
>>> *"I'm curious to what other systems you have in place that handle things
>>> like mapping, monitoring, FCC reporting, sales tracking, prospect
>>> qualification, inventory management, ip management, work orders, trouble
>>> tickets, scheduling, provisioning, automated suspension and payments,
>>> reporting, and more in addition to billing?"*
>>>
>>> With the small size of my company this is all very easily managed with
>>> simple (and free) spreadsheets. So this argument is irrelevant to me.  When
>>> I get to a size where it is no longer easily managed, then and only then
>>> will I start to pay for a service that can provide that (it will not be
>>> until then that my business can afford to pay for it).
>>>
>>> You then offer advice to pay for this stuff from the beginning. Not
>>> everyone is going to model their business in the way you think or society
>>> thinks it should be. My business model is very, very different from the
>>> norm. It's people that deviate from the "accepted standard", the ones that
>>> think outside the box, that tend to do really well. My idea of success and
>>> my idea of what and how a business should operate are not the same as
>>> yours.
>>>
>>> Billing is something that should not be this difficult and expensive.
>>> Why should I pay 5% of my revenue to someone that does nearly nothing??? If
>>> I take what wispmon charges, add that to what it cost me to run a payment,
>>> and then take out my operating costs, the likelihood of there being much
>>> left is very low. The credit card companies already steal almost 3% before
>>> I even pay the gateway company. Why are there so many different people
>>> involved to make is to I can collect $45 from my customer?
>>>
>>> I really like what stripe, swipe, and PayPal have done by basically
>>> taking one of the people out of that. The only problem is that they aren't
>>> set up well for monthly recurring payments. That is what I intend to close
>>> the gap on.
>>>
>>> Anyone who charges by the sub or has a monthly minimum so high that it
>>> isn't worth it does not have a business model I agree with.
>>>
>>> I had seriously considered wispmon, but quickly ruled them out as soon
>>> as I realized that you charge more for BYO Merchant account. I already have
>>> a merchant account and have no interest in paying $200 to sign up for a new
>>> one I have no experience with, or pay en extra $0.30 per sub per month
>>> because I want to use someone I already use and trust.
>>>
>>> Another problem with Wispmon is that the main website looks like it was
>>> built by using someone's free template that was simply modified old using
>>> basic HTML code. If that is the impression I get from the main website,
>>> what kind of product could they possibly be giving me? Will it look good?
>>> Will it be based on old code too? Will it be easy to use? Too many
>>> questions right off the bat. I'm not at all saying that this is how it is,
>>> just saying that perception is reality. My first impression wasn't good, so
>>> that sets the tone for the rest.
>>>
>>> You then went on to give me unsolicited advice as if to tell me how to
>>> be running my business. My question was not why I should or shouldn't do
>>> something, it was simply what options are out there. I've asked this
>>> question several times and have done very extensive research on several
>>> products. I didn't go that deep into wispmon because of my very first
>>> impressions. And now after the email you sent out I will never consider it
>>> again in the future.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>
>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Cameron Crum <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm curious what your review consisted of? To my knowledge, you never
>>> contacted us to ask any questions even after an offlist invitation. It
>>> seems if you are going to the trouble of creating something new, you would
>>> at least perform an exhaustive analysis meaning you are talking to someone
>>> to ask questions. I understand you think that perhaps the most important
>>> piece of your business should be free or close to it, but is that really
>>> where you want to skimp? Having owned a wisp for 8 years starting in 2003
>>> and sold to JAB in 2010, and actually been where you think you are now,
>>> when there really were few platforms available, I would have jumped at the
>>> chance to pay under $1 (or maybe slightly more) per sub to have all the
>>> capability that most of the current systems currently have. I'm curious to
>>> what other systems you have in place that handle things like mapping,
>>> monitoring, FCC reporting, sales tracking, prospect qualification,
>>> inventory management, ip management, work orders, trouble tickets,
>>> scheduling, provisioning, automated suspension and payments, reporting, and
>>> more in addition to billing? If you are using separate systems for all of
>>> these things, then it is probably costing you more than what you would pay
>>> for a single platform which does all of these things. I know you say you
>>> are small and if you are doing all of these things manually or with
>>> multiple platforms, there will be a day when that won't scale and you will
>>> either be killing yourself trying to keep up, or spending far more than you
>>> think to make it all work. My advice would be to do a bit more real
>>> research before you dig into rolling your own. Talk to people who have been
>>> in your shoes and were adverse to spending money on a good system. I tell
>>> people who are evaluating different systems, that even if they don't choose
>>> us, choose one of the ones out there. If you are just getting started, it
>>> is the best decision you will make. It is much easier to get in at the
>>> beginning than to convert later. The hardest part of being a self-starting
>>> entrepreneur is knowing when to let go of certain things and either pay
>>> someone to do them, or pay to get them out of the way so you can get down
>>> to growing your business. This I know for sure, as it is the hardest part
>>> for me.
>>>
>>> Cameron
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Brett A Mansfield <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> To be clear, this will not be a standard in any way. It's just to fill
>>>> a need where I see one. Something for the little guys like myself. This
>>>> will not be a solution for those big customers since it will be limited to
>>>> billing/CRM.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not doing this for profit. I'm doing this on the side and the
>>>> numbers should make it break even.
>>>>
>>>> Eric, I really like that comic strip, it is exactly what I was thinking
>>>> when I thought of doing this. Haha.
>>>>
>>>> There is NOTHING on the market like it though. Something that works,
>>>> that is nearly free, that is for the very small guys where every single
>>>> penny counts.
>>>>
>>>> If nobody in the world uses this system but me, then I'll still feel it
>>>> was worth my time. My partners are volunteering their time and so am I, so
>>>> our cost will be very low to develop this.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 10:30 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Good luck.  It certainly has been tried before...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Brett A Mansfield <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So, after a lot of review of every billing solution I can find out
>>>>> there, I've come to the conclusion that there is no good billing system.
>>>>> Everything out there either requires you use their merchant, has a minimum
>>>>> monthly cost, or isn't really designed for the ISP. Even the stuff that 
>>>>> has
>>>>> come out most recently isn't a good fit.
>>>>>
>>>>> For those of you who are smaller and don't want to pay a monthly
>>>>> minimum, or want to use your choice of merchant, or don't want to pay a 
>>>>> per
>>>>> user charge, something new will be coming soon!
>>>>>
>>>>> I've spoken to a few proven software engineers in the financial side
>>>>> of things and we are partnering up to develop a new ISP billing software.
>>>>> It will be turnkey, very easy to use, and can be deployed either by you on
>>>>> your servers, or can be hosted on ours. It will only handle
>>>>> billing/invoicing and CRM/ticketing. Best of all, it's practically free!
>>>>>
>>>>> More details to come. I'll keep you posted when we have more info.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Welcome to 2014?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>
>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> *From: *"Adam Moffett" <[email protected]>
>>>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>>>> *Sent: *Monday, December 7, 2015 1:32:33 PM
>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Ubiquiti has a CRM?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/7/2015 2:27 PM, Brett A Mansfield wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It's funny you mentioned waveapps. That is what I started out with. It
>>>>> was a disaster. And the fact they don't allow multiple email addresses for
>>>>> recurring invoices was a major deal breaker for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've since moved to UBNTs airCRM. It is an excellent setup on paper,
>>>>> but is seriously lacking currently and is very erratic. I need something
>>>>> solid, secure, and that I don't have to worry about all the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Joshaven Mailing Lists <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Plat has excellent support
>>>>>
>>>>> In my opinion, the problems with plat are:
>>>>> 1) The user interface is a pain in the butt and generally discouraging.
>>>>> 2) The software depends on a Windows platform and even worse direct
>>>>> database connections from the client.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) In most places when you want to alter something like customer data
>>>>> you have to click on the field to edit  from a table and then go to the 
>>>>> top
>>>>> to make the change in something that is like an address bar… of course you
>>>>> can get used to this but Plat is full of non-user friendly quirks like
>>>>> this.  It reminds me of what it feels like to go back and use Windows 95 
>>>>> or
>>>>> Windows 3.1 when I am used to modern operating systems.  The system feels
>>>>> almost like directly editing a database except that the software does
>>>>> enforce logical edits so it is not nearly as dangerous as direct database
>>>>> minupulation.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) If you want to run a good highly available platform then you will
>>>>> be spending a lot on software licensing with Microsoft.  What is the going
>>>>> rate for a MSSQL cluster now of days?  Of course you can throw this on old
>>>>> rusty crusty in a closet and run the free version of MSSQL but we are
>>>>> carriers not hacks right?  Also you are depending on ODBC database
>>>>> connections between your clients and the server.  Opening direct database
>>>>> connections to my billing server gives me the creeps even if it is only
>>>>> open to a network under my administration.  I’m a fan of local host db
>>>>> access only except for database peers.  I would really like to see ISP
>>>>> billing software be web based using standard https protocols and having no
>>>>> client side dependencies like odbc configurations and client executables.
>>>>> Try using Plat on a tablet… I don’t want my billing platform holding back
>>>>> my ability to creatively design my installation process…
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I feel like I am ragging on Plat… maybe I am a bit but I want to
>>>>> underscore their support.  They are truly exceptional to work with and you
>>>>> can rely on their platform.  Just don’t expect to enjoy using it.  If you
>>>>> like function over form then you may be a perfect match for Plat… I just
>>>>> wish they would do some magic to address the above two complaints.
>>>>>
>>>>> My recommendation to them is to become database & OS agnostic (at
>>>>> least MySQL or MSSQL and run on Apache) and to make the client interface 
>>>>> be
>>>>> 100% standards compliment browser based.  I suspect if they don’t do this
>>>>> they will find themselves with a EOL product in the next few years.
>>>>>
>>>>> Right now there are really good options emerging like WaveApps.  Wave
>>>>> offers free billing including credit card processing at fair rates.  They
>>>>> don’t fit perfectly with an ISP (yet) but they are promising an API which
>>>>> means that a good solutions provider can crank out an integrations 
>>>>> solution
>>>>> with Wave for front end billing.  I am also super excited to see what 
>>>>> Sonar
>>>>> has to offer.  I hope their offer is solid and we have a glorious 
>>>>> solution…
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> At any rate I am waiting with bated breath to see where this lands
>>>>> over the next few months.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> Joshaven Potter
>>>>> MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, UACA
>>>>> Google Hangouts: [email protected]
>>>>> Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I can setup Platypus for billing only in less than an hour, including
>>>>> setting up plans/rates/services/importing customers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> That get's to be a little in depth and probably a loaded
>>>>>> question...but I know when we moved to Powercode the old team that wasn't
>>>>>> very good had it done in one afternoon.  This was from Quickbooks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you including database conversion?  Items, customers, current
>>>>>>> balances, recurring billing, credit cards, etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then there’s setting up the online customer payment portal.
>>>>>>> Especially if customers already had online accounts.  And you need to 
>>>>>>> hook
>>>>>>> it into your merchant account, put your logo on it, test it, etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 05, 2015 2:24 PM
>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm simply saying 2 days is a long time to setup a billing system.
>>>>>>> For someone that wants it running "immediately" 2 days is a LONG time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Philip Rankin <[email protected]
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey, I'm not in this for an argument.  I am just offering to help a
>>>>>>>> guy out if I can.  I'll bow out of this conversation.
>>>>>>>> On Dec 5, 2015 1:37 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Two days???  Powercode takes like an hour.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Philip Rankin <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Guys, I am still a major believer in Tucows Platypus.  Brett, I
>>>>>>>>>> could have you up and running with Plat in under 2 days as long as 
>>>>>>>>>> you can
>>>>>>>>>> answer speed and pricing questions as I ask them.  And all I would 
>>>>>>>>>> need is
>>>>>>>>>> remote access to a Windows 7 computer.  Let me know if you are 
>>>>>>>>>> interested.
>>>>>>>>>> Most of the training can be done remotely in less than a day, too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Simon Westlake <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think it is still pretty early on.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/4/2015 6:22 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So I guess it does that...lol.  I
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ...

Reply via email to