I thought a bit more about what I think your trying to do… You can use router marks to create routing tables. You can match the source address and apply a route mark to the traffic. Then that traffic will use the matching route table. This way you can have one default route for provider x and another for y. Is that helpful?
Sincerely, Joshaven Potter Google Hangouts: j...@g2wireless.co Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370 supp...@joshaven.com > On Dec 15, 2015, at 10:38 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm > <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > right or wrong, we have half our IPs going out one provider and the other > half going out the other, no BGP today > > The whole network is the same area, both edge provider routers are > distributing default route, so traffic just goes to the closest edge > (splitting the IP space geographically is not an option) > We have an EOIP tunnel between the two edge routers sending the traffic where > it needs to go > > We have a final failure where if one provider is down, and that IP space is > unusabe the other router will NAT that traffic out the alternate provider > (interim until BGP) the problem is if for any reason the EOIP tunnel goes > down, the NAT starts even though the other provider is still up (for the most > part, the EOIP should not go down unless a provider is down but... > > > I have had no success in finding out how to distribute policy routes, maybe > because you cant or im looking for the wrong terms. Is there a way to say > x.x.x.x/23 via default route distributed from router X and y.y.y.y/23 via > default route distributed from router Y ? > > Is this a matter of filters and different areas? > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
