Thats what im doing at the two edge routers, but i dont know how to propagate that out to the rest of the network. BGP is on the horizon, Its such a pain to get one of our upstreams to change things, I dont want to change what theyre anouncing for us until we have BGP in play. Our primary OSPF network is just getting the finer details (fixing my f&*%ups) hammered out, then we will move down that path
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Joshaven Mailing Lists < [email protected]> wrote: > I thought a bit more about what I think your trying to do… > > You can use router marks to create routing tables. You can match the > source address and apply a route mark to the traffic. Then that traffic > will use the matching route table. This way you can have one default route > for provider x and another for y. Is that helpful? > > > Sincerely, > Joshaven Potter > Google Hangouts: [email protected] > Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370 > [email protected] > > > > On Dec 15, 2015, at 10:38 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > > right or wrong, we have half our IPs going out one provider and the other > half going out the other, no BGP today > > The whole network is the same area, both edge provider routers are > distributing default route, so traffic just goes to the closest edge > (splitting the IP space geographically is not an option) > We have an EOIP tunnel between the two edge routers sending the traffic > where it needs to go > > We have a final failure where if one provider is down, and that IP space > is unusabe the other router will NAT that traffic out the alternate > provider (interim until BGP) the problem is if for any reason the EOIP > tunnel goes down, the NAT starts even though the other provider is still up > (for the most part, the EOIP should not go down unless a provider is down > but... > > > I have had no success in finding out how to distribute policy routes, > maybe because you cant or im looking for the wrong terms. Is there a way to > say x.x.x.x/23 via default route distributed from router X and y.y.y.y/23 > via default route distributed from router Y ? > > Is this a matter of filters and different areas? > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
