Just thinking out loud here....how much extra work would it be to make it also able to be used on a peak? I mean, if you are making "one non-pen to rule them all", it would be adjustable for pitch, pipe size, and for peaks.
https://www.talleycom.com/images/MTSRT-PM-B_big.jpg Also, perhaps it would be able to have some type of add-on purchase which could add a larger ballast for 3-4" pipes 10' tall. Like, if you had this (but adjustable) http://www.3starinc.com/images/super/ROHN_JRM23855_800x600t.jpg ...with the ability to add an outer ring and make it into this: http://www.3starinc.com/images/super/ROHN_25GBRM_800x600t.jpg On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 2:40 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, that is always a problem. The more assembly you do during > fabrication, the more it costs to ship, the larger the packing crate is, > the more expensive packing is etc etc. > > *From:* Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Saturday, January 9, 2016 2:35 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Non penetrating mounts > > Anything you can do to speed assembly but still take up less space. I > never liked how long they took to put together. > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016, 12:05 PM Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I get constantly asked to do a non penetrating mount. I have always >> resisted because there are a ton of them out there already. But I get >> almost daily searches for this term on my website. It appears folks >> presume I have one. >> >> If I did one, I would like to have some feature or quality that >> differentiates it from the rest. Perhaps a unit that can be locked or >> hinged for flat or peak mounts. >> >> Maybe one with hinged legs that give it a wider footprint using greater >> leverage so you don’t need as many concrete blocks. >> >> I dunno, any ideas? >> >
