(not for a 25g in the last example. That was just a good ballast ring example)
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just thinking out loud here....how much extra work would it be to make it > also able to be used on a peak? I mean, if you are making "one non-pen to > rule them all", it would be adjustable for pitch, pipe size, and for peaks. > > https://www.talleycom.com/images/MTSRT-PM-B_big.jpg > > Also, perhaps it would be able to have some type of add-on purchase which > could add a larger ballast for 3-4" pipes 10' tall. Like, if you had this > (but adjustable) > http://www.3starinc.com/images/super/ROHN_JRM23855_800x600t.jpg > > ...with the ability to add an outer ring and make it into this: > http://www.3starinc.com/images/super/ROHN_25GBRM_800x600t.jpg > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 2:40 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> Yeah, that is always a problem. The more assembly you do during >> fabrication, the more it costs to ship, the larger the packing crate is, >> the more expensive packing is etc etc. >> >> *From:* Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Saturday, January 9, 2016 2:35 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Non penetrating mounts >> >> Anything you can do to speed assembly but still take up less space. I >> never liked how long they took to put together. >> >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016, 12:05 PM Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >>> I get constantly asked to do a non penetrating mount. I have always >>> resisted because there are a ton of them out there already. But I get >>> almost daily searches for this term on my website. It appears folks >>> presume I have one. >>> >>> If I did one, I would like to have some feature or quality that >>> differentiates it from the rest. Perhaps a unit that can be locked or >>> hinged for flat or peak mounts. >>> >>> Maybe one with hinged legs that give it a wider footprint using greater >>> leverage so you don’t need as many concrete blocks. >>> >>> I dunno, any ideas? >>> >> >
