It would be a nice feature if you could click a button and temporarily flood the RF link on all SM's so that 'link status' could be accurately measured for uplink and downlink. This would be particularly useful when trying to track down those SM's with poor modulation that are a drag on the frame utilization.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]> wrote: > In addition to what George said… > > If you have newer software use the ‘link status’ page - it shows a much > nicer presentation of both sides. > > The radios also take some time to reach full modulation. Without traffic > newly registered links with stay in low modulation. Force some traffic > through the link and modulation will increase, if the bit error rate is low > enough. Increasing modulation takes into account the bit error rate, and > without data, there isn’t much to go on. Slowly ramping up is arguably > better than going to full modulation and then having to drop back rapidly as > soon as data hits. > > Mark > > > > On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:41 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > > There still seems to be some misconception on this. 8X/1X means that it's 8X > capable / 1X current. It's always going to show 8X capable (or 2X for FSK, > 3X for 430). After the / is what you need to pay attention to. Also, the > uplink and downlink are independent. On the AP session status page (power > tab), that's the downlink rate to that SM. On the SM main page, link status, > etc., that's the uplink rate to the AP. > > What band is this? 2.4, 3.6, 5.4 or 5.7? And what software version do you > have on the radios? It'd be best to stick with 13.2.1 for now. > > For the longest time I too thought this was backwards. I assure you it's > correct. > > On 2/1/2016 2:26 PM, Ryan Mano wrote: > > 8x down 1x up > > this is the first sm am trying to install on it > > the freq am on is very clean not sure what the problem is....unless am > missing a setting? > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Josh > Luthman<[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 3:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] pmp450 > > Signals on each side? > > 8x down 1x up? Could be an uplink path issue or heavy interference at the > AP side. Have you changed frequencies? Spectrum analysis? Is this the > first SM on the AP? > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Ryan Mano <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> am new to the pmp450 looks straight forward but am having issues >> registering it from a distance >> >> when I point the sm which is 12 feet in front of the ap it syncs 8x by 1x >> ...but if I go 1mile down the road it doesn't register at all >> >> not sure what am doing wrong...has anyone had this similar issue like >> this? >> >> thanks >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > >
