I've used some vdsl equipment from netsys direct, worked great. Here's
their Ethernet extender:

http://www.netsys-direct.com/product_p/nv-202ekit.htm

On Monday, February 8, 2016, Matt <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Buy a set of those DSL thingamajigs. Unless you're trying to run PoE to
> > power a remote device. Then you're screwed. Ethernet does not work beyond
> > 100 meters. If it does, it won't be reliable.
>
> That's what I was thinking.  Anyone know of any that are not terribly
> expensive?  Hopefully under $500 for pair?  If a new line needs run it
> will likely have to be bored in.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > On 2/8/2016 3:22 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >
> > I like TJ’s suggestion, but if you wanted a shotgun approach, you could
> try
> > breaking up the twisted pairs and give yourself two 4-wire ends on each
> side
> > that’ll hopefully still handle 10mbps, then bond them. BAM! 20mbps. It’s
> so
> > terrible it just might work.
> >
> >
> >
> > Chris Wright
> >
> > Network Administrator
> >
> > Velociter Wireless
> >
> > 209-838-1221 x115
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of TJ
> Trout
> > Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 12:52 PM
> > To: [email protected] <javascript:;>
> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 500 Foot Cat-5 Run
> >
> >
> >
> > do you have conduit? pull better cable, like TCL2 should work at 100M no
> > problem, if not use vdsl ethernet extenders
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > dig it up halfway and plug in a PoE powered switch :P
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > Run fiber? :) You're only about 172ft past ethernet spec :P
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Matt <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> I have a ~500 foot buried cat-5 run that works fine at 10base FDX but
> >> not 100base.  Anyone know of a way to get it to run 100base?  I need
> >> about 20mbps out of this.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to