OOBE rules have/are being modified so as to meet the intended DoD requirements but not hamstring the manufacturers with expensive filters etc. I believe they pushed back some or all of the implementation for a year. there was an explanation at last years wispapalooza on the technical details and i know steve coran posted some filings etc. to the list a while back. I think the FCC chose the UBNT method over the WISPA/JAB method.
don't quote me on this tho...i might have just been drunk in vegas and dreamed all this up lol. -Sean On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > Will the "next generation PMP 450 SM" have the same throughput and > range as the current standard PMP450 SM with a reflector dish in 5.8 > ghz band? Just concerned the new OOBE rules might reduce usefulness > of 5 ghz band for longer range PtmP and PTP? I am guessing they will > have some added filtering to meet the OOBE rules and just hoping this > does not reduce range terribly? 24 volt or 48 volt POE? It would be > nice if they worked on either voltage to make swap outs easier. Will > also slightly reduce cost of swapping power supplies. > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Matt Mangriotis > <[email protected]> wrote: > > YES! > > > > We are undertaking this project and working toward a next generation PMP > 450 > > SM that will cover the entire 5 GHz band (from 4.9-5.9 GHz), and be less > > expensive than the 450i SM. > > > > At this point, I can’t comment on much surrounding the launch, as we’ve > only > > recently embarked down this path. > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam Lambie > > Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 8:59 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450i 5.1 and 5.2 non overlapping channels? > > > > > > > > Thank you Matt. I appreciate the info. > > > > Are there any plans on creating 1 450 SM that can handle all 4 > frequencies? > > > > That would be super.... > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 3:30 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > No, the regular 450 is hardware limited to 5470-5900. > > > > > > > > On 2/20/2016 3:55 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote: > > > > Will the 450 CPE work in 5.2? > > > > Jeff Broadwick > > > > ConVergence Technologies, Inc. > > > > 312-205-2519 Office > > > > 574-220-7826 Cell > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > On Feb 20, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Tushar Patel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Matt, > > > > > > > > To take advantage don't we need cheaper CPE? > > > > Tushar > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 2016, at 12:43 PM, Matt Mangriotis > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Didn’t see anyone answer you on this Sam. > > > > > > > > 5.1 GHz (UNII-1) is 100 MHz (5150-5250 MHz), and is not DFS controlled, > and > > follows similar rules to 5.8 GHz. This band is available in R14.1.1. > > > > > > > > 5.2 GHz (UNII-2) is also 100 MHz (5250-5350 MHz), but is a bit less > useful > > in that the max EIRP allowed is 30 dBm and it’s subject to DFS radar > > detection mechanisms. > > > > > > > > Additional info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U-NII > > > > > > > > Taking advantage of these bands, however, can prove hugely useful and > > several of our customers are getting equipment deployed and working soon. > > > > > > > > (Note: 5.2 and 5.4 will be supported in the R14.1.2 beta release that > will > > be out very soon). > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam Lambie > > Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 4:54 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [AFMUG] 450i 5.1 and 5.2 non overlapping channels? > > > > > > > > Is there any documentation or list knowledge on how big each frequency > is? > > > > Just wondering if it is worth it to go to the 450i and the ridiculously > > expensive SM's. > > > > We are running out of spectrum in 5.4 and 5.8 though. > > > > > > -- > > > > -- > > Sam Lambie > > Taosnet Wireless Tech. > > 575-758-7598 Office > > www.Taosnet.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- > > Sam Lambie > > Taosnet Wireless Tech. > > 575-758-7598 Office > > www.Taosnet.com >
